Brand MU Day
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Login

    Minigames in MUSHes

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Game Gab
    68 Posts 23 Posters 1.2k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • FaradayF
      Faraday @somasatori
      last edited by

      @somasatori said in Minigames in MUSHes:

      1. it should hopefully make it a little easier to create more engaging plots that can be accessed by people outside of scenes.

      Code-wise, that’s really neat. Props.

      People-wise I fear that you’re just going to run into folks clue-farming just by wandering around the grid using random skills or whatever to search for stuff. (That’s been my personal experience with trying to do coded ‘discovery’ things in the past, and also in puzzle games. I remember my friend searching for a mystery clue in Wasteland back in 1997 just clicking “Use -> Perception” in random directions over and over again.) It also seems like it would take a metric ton of prep-work to arrange the clues for a plot in a way that neither gets solved too quickly nor gets blocked when someone can’t find one specific clue.

      Those concerns aside, it’s an interesting idea and I’m all for people trying new things.

      somasatoriS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • somasatoriS
        somasatori @Faraday
        last edited by

        @Faraday said in Minigames in MUSHes:

        @somasatori said in Minigames in MUSHes:
        People-wise I fear that you’re just going to run into folks clue-farming just by wandering around the grid using random skills or whatever to search for stuff.

        Yeah, this is my fear as well ._. That’s why I was thinking that I might make it participant based, where someone signs up to join the mystery, similar to like an events system. That won’t prevent people from joining mysteries and clue farming to troll, but I figure whoever uses the system can ban that person after that point I guess.

        I was also thinking about setting it so that a mystery participant makes progress in the mystery - as in they advance the progress tracker- and people who aren’t signed up to the mystery will get some kind of option to be initiated. It would also allow for people not connected to the mystery to discover a clue that might have already been investigated and be “initiated” into the mystery apparatus.

        “I discovered the ritual circle in the warehouse on 12th Street that points to the cultists of the crimson warden.”
        “We knew this already, but you show good initiative!”
        etc.

        I’m not making a MUSH, I’m kind of doing a mu-in-a-box thing for nwod since I very much missed the genre over the usual 20th anniversary/old world of darkness current trend (though I’ll probably set up a prototype sandbox once (read: if it ever) is done).

        "And the Fool says, pointing to the invertebrate fauna feeding in the graves: 'Here a monarchy reigns, mightier than you: His Majesty the Worm.'"
        Italo Calvino, The Castle of Crossed Destines

        PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • PavelP
          Pavel @somasatori
          last edited by

          @somasatori There’s an easy solution, though. Just code a way for observant staffers to slap clue-farmers upside the head through the internet.

          He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
          BE AN ADULT

          MuseM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
          • MuseM
            Muse @Pavel
            last edited by

            @Pavel Or maybe a self limiting factor, like clues know how long since the last clue and will stay in hiding until it’s time again.

            "She never looked nice. She looked like art, and art wasn't supposed to look nice; it was supposed to make you feel something."
            ― Rainbow Rowell, Eleanor & Park

            PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
            • GashlycrumbG
              Gashlycrumb @Pavel
              last edited by

              @Pavel said in Minigames in MUSHes:

              @Tez said in Minigames in MUSHes:

              Video games give you sight, sound, real designed elements that work together to create a satisfying feedback loops that makes the grind provide the dopamine.

              They even occasionally hire psychologists to work out the best ways to do this so they can take a lot of your money.

              I am not sure the sight and sound stuff are the relevant bits. It’s just ordinary operant conditioning, and a simple trick to ‘teach’ at that, you don’t have to back-chain or anything. Still probably the kid who teaches the puppy training class at PetCo is better at it than most shrinks.

              It’s very relevant to MU-running, what with how frequently good-player behavior is unrewarded and troublesome behavior gets reinforced.

              Here, this will help: https://search.worldcat.org/title/Don't-shoot-the-dog-:-the-art-of-teaching-and-training/oclc/1085215000

              "This is Liberty Hall; you can spit on the mat and call the cat a bastard!"
              – A. Bertram Chandler

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • somasatoriS
                somasatori
                last edited by

                So there’s a bit of game theory involved in the mystery thing, I think. Just using the prereq system, you could either set it to be very open, like no prereqs (or very minimal), let everyone on the grid join in, OR you could be like “I’m only allowing Changeling cops who are summer courtiers with Occult 3 and Mantle 1” and maybe get the two or three people that have access to that. If the character doesn’t meet the prereqs for the clue, they will never see it.

                Going super restrictive kinda defeats the purpose IMO, but here’s my stupid idealism getting in my way, I guess. The PyReach project uses the same grid layout system that the Reach did, hence the name. So as a for instance you might have an area code of DT for “Downtown,” then each room in that district will have an incremental room number. So DT01, DT02, DT03, etc. My vision of this was that someone could post on the BBS to the effect of: “I have hidden a clue in the rooms between DT01-DT05, I’ll take on the first five people who find this clue into the following mystery, which is linked to my plot, blah blah blah.”

                I’ve been having this thought of how we might make MUSHing through storylines easier for people who are working and have very busy lives and the thought of West Marches-style play came up (and coincidentally I had a conversation immediately after that about the same topic). So, you could have these kind of forum-ish style of play with people dropping into and out of plots based on their interaction with different clues and secrets throughout the plotline, with various GMs running different elements.

                "And the Fool says, pointing to the invertebrate fauna feeding in the graves: 'Here a monarchy reigns, mightier than you: His Majesty the Worm.'"
                Italo Calvino, The Castle of Crossed Destines

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                • D
                  dvoraen @somasatori
                  last edited by

                  @somasatori I’m guessing this is basically a lockstring variant you’re using for filtering out the accessibility of these hints/mysteries/clues?

                  somasatoriS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                  • somasatoriS
                    somasatori @dvoraen
                    last edited by

                    @dvoraen said in Minigames in MUSHes:

                    @somasatori I’m guessing this is basically a lockstring variant you’re using for filtering out the accessibility of these hints/mysteries/clues?

                    Yeah, that’s basically it! It’s a lockstring that uses the ‘stats’ attribute on the character, then does a string match for value names (which are absolute, like skill, merit, words like ‘template’ and so on) and then attempts to apply either another string match (for templates, merits, lodges, blah blah), or establishes the least value like if you listed mantle:1 as a lock, but the person has mantle:2 (or whatever).

                    "And the Fool says, pointing to the invertebrate fauna feeding in the graves: 'Here a monarchy reigns, mightier than you: His Majesty the Worm.'"
                    Italo Calvino, The Castle of Crossed Destines

                    P 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • P
                      Pyrephox Administrators @somasatori
                      last edited by

                      @somasatori Pardon my code ignorance, but it feels like you could use a variation of this to have plot attributes - i.e. someone signs up for Plot 13: The Square Bullet Hole Murders, gets an attribute like square_bullet, and could be eligible to find any of the clues for that plot…but it also might open up things like a plot command that auto-mails everyone who has signed up for that plot, or that lets GMs easily pull up how many people are involved in a given plot (or even plots as a whole, and how many people are involved in, like, 4 plots, if they want to do some quick analysis of how interest/involvement is distributed across the playerbase).

                      I’m not saying you want to, or that’s even the point, but it’s something that intrigues me, as a way to have a decent understanding of activity levels beyond log-in numbers, and maybe recognize if there are people who might appreciate being drawn in.

                      somasatoriS 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • somasatoriS
                        somasatori @Pyrephox
                        last edited by

                        @Pyrephox that’s not a bad idea! I think doing something like that but on the opposite direction. The clue is linked to a database entry for the mystery which has a list of all the mystery attributes like difficulty, number of clues, any descriptive text, etc. it wouldn’t be hard (I say, currently at the clinic and nowhere near my personal computer to actually investigate this) to add in storage for the character object ID.

                        "And the Fool says, pointing to the invertebrate fauna feeding in the graves: 'Here a monarchy reigns, mightier than you: His Majesty the Worm.'"
                        Italo Calvino, The Castle of Crossed Destines

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                        • O
                          Ominous
                          last edited by

                          I am all for mini games. It’s part of why I lean more towards RPI than MUSHes.

                          Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                          • PavelP
                            Pavel @Muse
                            last edited by

                            @Muse said in Minigames in MUSHes:

                            @Pavel Or maybe a self limiting factor, like clues know how long since the last clue and will stay in hiding until it’s time again.

                            Just let me have my slap-upside-head tool okay. 😞

                            He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                            BE AN ADULT

                            MuseM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • MuseM
                              Muse @Pavel
                              last edited by

                              @Pavel said in Minigames in MUSHes:

                              @Muse said in Minigames in MUSHes:

                              @Pavel Or maybe a self limiting factor, like clues know how long since the last clue and will stay in hiding until it’s time again.

                              Just let me have my slap-upside-head tool okay. 😞

                              Fiiiiiine, but only because I’m a sucker for a sad face.

                              "She never looked nice. She looked like art, and art wasn't supposed to look nice; it was supposed to make you feel something."
                              ― Rainbow Rowell, Eleanor & Park

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • First post
                                Last post