Obviously, receipts are handy but they’re not a requirement. And I’d (speaking only for myself, though with a polite nod in the direction of that Admin tag) rather not make posting every shred of evidence possible the expectation here.
Павел Семёнович Куликовский
@Pavel
He/Him
Best posts made by Pavel
-
RE: Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujoposted in Rough and Rowdy
-
RE: Real life happyposted in No Escape from Reality
Client: Well, I’m gay.
Me: Mhm…
Client: And… that’s okay?
Me: slow swivel in chair to look at giant Progress Pride Flag on my wall
Me: slow swivel in chair to look back at client
Client: happy tearsBeing a client’s safe space to come out is a gift that keeps on giving.
-
RE: What's up with Spellbound?posted in Game Gab
I love that. More gamerunning folk should feel… allowed, for lack of a better term, to do this sort of thing.
-
RE: Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujoposted in Rough and Rowdy
@Jumpscare said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:
That means that since the birth of BMD, no other game has negatively affected MU* players as broadly or as painfully as Star Wars: Age of Alliances.
A board of women, queers, and allies reacting strongly against sexual misconduct and anti-reporting prejudice… Isn’t that how we started in the first place?
-
Descs and MU Historyposted in Rough and Rowdy
For posterity, I present thus:
Tracy is a man and he is a very hansome and manly man.He likes women a lot and women like him too but men think he is compitishion.He has very long brown shiny hair everywhere and a little blue eyes that are mostly green but very hansome anywya.You can tell a lot of things from his eyes.He has a very big bulge in his jeans where the dick would be and it is not a sock because it makes all women almost orgasm with desire.Behind him is a very firm muscled ass that makes you want to slap it and play with it in lots of ways but only if your a women.If you are a man you will die if you touch it because Tracy is strong and very not Gay.If you are a women he winks and smiles at you and thinks you have a nice personality.If you are a man again he frowns at you and it makes you not hit on him or on any women when hes here.He likes lots of women very much and likes very few men but not as boyfriends.And he has a shitr which is nice and blue.I mean shirt sorry.
-
RE: Banningsposted in Rough and Rowdy
From what I’ve seen, you are a people with boundless empathy, but you choose who to direct that towards.
Not to really engage in the debate, here, but that’s literally the same as everyone else.
-
RE: Unspeakables: The Politics Thread 2024posted in No Escape from Reality
So obviously it’s a very dark time, horrid things incoming and so forth…
But did anyone actually have The Onion buying Infowars on their 2024 bingo cards?
-
RE: Good things in Mushingposted in Game Gab
Me. I’m a good thing about mushing.
And this isn’t a throw away joke, or an ego thing, or whatever. But I’ve finally been able to arrive at the conclusion that yes, my RP is good. My events are good. My being present on a game is good. And I’m finally free to feel that I am good enough.
So there. Me. I’m a good thing about mushing.
-
RE: Los Angeles 2043: A Blade Runner MUSH - Discussionposted in Game Gab
@Warma-Sheen said in Los Angeles 2043: A Blade Runner MUSH - Discussion:
Just because you can open a game on your own doesn’t mean you should.
You should. It might last, it might not, but at least stuff’s being made even for a moment.
-
RE: Banningsposted in Rough and Rowdy
@GF We’re for taco Tuesdays, no-pants Fridays, and the violent and utter overthrow of the capitalistic, white-supremacist patriarchy. And tea.
Latest posts made by Pavel
-
RE: Scenes within Scenesposted in Game Gab
@Artemis said in Scenes within Scenes:
I think it can get annoying if people are using them in bad faith
I think this right here underpins a great many negative experiences with coded systems designed with the intent to enhance the experience, or compensate for limitations of the time. They’re not inherently bad; they’re just often poorly used, or of an era where they aren’t required any longer but are kept around for the sake of nostalgic completeness’ sake.
-
RE: Scenes within Scenesposted in Game Gab
@Roz One could hypothetically have all the tabletalk ‘scenes’ logged and filed as sub-scenes under/linked to the main scene. Though I imagine it’d be a bit of a bugger figuring out what the tabletalk scenes are reacting to… but I’ll leave that to the people who read logs for fun.
-
RE: Numetal/Retromuxposted in Rough and Rowdy
@Gashlycrumb said in Numetal/Retromux:
You’re not supposed to be able to maintain power by making everyone refuse to cooperate with you.
Ah, the <insert political party> gambit.
-
RE: Numetal/Retromuxposted in Rough and Rowdy
@MisterBoring said in Numetal/Retromux:
@Gashlycrumb said in Numetal/Retromux:
taking risks for and licking the ass of a “leader” who insulted them, openly informed them that he’d fuck them over at the slightest chance, and never rewarded them
Isn’t this just on-theme for… Vampire?
I guess it’d depend on whether they’re doing that to the characters or to the players. Given it’s PC leadership in WoD, it could be either or both.
-
RE: Numetal/Retromuxposted in Rough and Rowdy
@Gashlycrumb said in Numetal/Retromux:
taking risks for and licking the ass of a “leader” who insulted them, openly informed them that he’d fuck them over at the slightest chance, and never rewarded them
Common Camarilla L.
-
RE: Scenes within Scenesposted in Game Gab
@Roz I fear any time we speak of generalities in MUing we’re going to have to have “Except on Arx” as a meme—like Crash Course World History’s near-infamous Except The Mongols crash-cut (as they are the exception to so many of history’s expectations).
-
RE: Scenes within Scenesposted in Game Gab
@Faraday said in Scenes within Scenes:
@Pavel said in Scenes within Scenes:
Because one can interact with people outside of their little group, should they choose.
Theoretically I guess, but in my experience this almost never happens. (see the comments above regarding interruptions, being yelled at for spam, etc.)
The only poses I ever saw going to the main room were the static announcements or the “oops I forgot to use tt command” nonsense.
But to each their own.
Irritatingly true, but I feel that might be a misapplication of the idea. If one is being loud and rambunctious at their table then it should be part of the main scene as well.
But I have no llama in this race, I don’t have the attention span for a 90-minute movie without checking my phone, much less a 90-minute “look how great I am” romp with fifty other half-dressed participants.
-
RE: When is the last time you played?posted in Game Gab
Aaarr Peee?
I vaguely recall this as a concept. A thought. A theory. Something I did once, in my youth…
-
RE: Scenes within Scenesposted in Game Gab
@Faraday said in Scenes within Scenes:
But if you’re not interacting with anyone outside of your little group, and you don’t want to spam other people or be spammed in return, why does the room actually matter? What is the tangible advantage of keeping everyone jammed together rather than in separate rooms / separate scenes?
Because one can interact with people outside of their little group, should they choose. They can ask the salient question, smuggle weapons, throw fruit-but-vegetables. There are more options.
