Secret Society

For access to the SECRET SOCIETY SUB SECTION

Posts

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    You want it in your game but you don’t want people to enjoy it too much?

    alt text

    If a game allows SA at all, I don’t see anyone signing up in the first place unless they’re into that. You aren’t gonna discover a group of very serious artistic writers who are willing to do this but like, not in a sinful way. Opt-in doesn’t matter to your target audience because they opted in by playing the game.

  • RE: Liberation Drama!?

    Aw man, I already microwaved my popcorn.

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    @Shygaming said:

    And I’ve seen that dynamic poison games before. I genuinely cannot count how many times I’ve seen some supposedly awful villain doing horrific things to another character while everyone involved OOC is having a wonderful time and the “victim” is actively helping arrange it. It stops functioning as an unpleasant consequence of living in a horrible setting and starts functioning as content being provided for people who want that content.

    This has to be one of the most buckwild paragraphs I’ve ever read on any RP forum. I’m actually more weirded out by this than the opinions on SA stuff which is very much not my kink.

    Why do you want people’s experience of a hobby to be bad?

    Seek help.

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    @Shygaming said:

    That is actually one of the reasons I don’t want a preference flag for it in Paroxysm. If I wanted to facilitate CNC RP then an opt in system would make perfect sense. I don’t.

    That also doesn’t mean someone has to sit there and explicitly RP an assault they don’t want to write. Fade to black exists. You can draw boundaries around what has to be depicted without making whether the event itself can happen dependent on whether somebody finds the scenario appealing OOC.

    I completely understand the argument for banning SA outright. I think that is a coherent policy. I also understand allowing it as part of a setting where players know what they are signing up for.

    I just think “SA is allowed but only when everyone involved wants SA RP” produces something very different from either of those things.

    Players joining your game will know what they are signing up for, then, right? No, uh, jumpscares in cgen? Like there will be a big button on the login screen that says ‘by playing here you will be exposed to SA and may not opt out’, right?

    Like people know this? Yes? Along with whatever other terrible things are possible?

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    @Shygaming said:

    The middle ground where it is technically possible but only if the victim OOCly opts into it turns it into CNC fetish play almost by definition. At that point the “evil rapist” isn’t actually imposing something horrible on another character. The two players have negotiated a rape fantasy together.

    counterpoint: instead of encouraging CNC fetish play, you’re instead enabling the people who are getting off on violating the other player, rather than the character. that is: the people for whom the enjoyment is in making the other player feel upset and being able to do stuff in the game to them the other player doesn’t want.

    but also you’re still gonna get plenty of folks signing up for CNC fun. seems a little silly to get precious about it. like it just feels like "okay nobody better get gross and kinky and enjoy this, we’re above all that! it’s only okay to RP this if it makes the players miserable.

    And I’ve seen that dynamic poison games before. I genuinely cannot count how many times I’ve seen some supposedly awful villain doing horrific things to another character while everyone involved OOC is having a wonderful time and the “victim” is actively helping arrange it. It stops functioning as an unpleasant consequence of living in a horrible setting and starts functioning as content being provided for people who want that content.

    it seems weird to frame this as “a horrible thing is no longer being imposed on another character.” cause it is? like, in this scenario the character doesn’t want it. it’s just that the players are having fun while the characters aren’t. isn’t that usually the goal? is the goal instead for players to be upset/unhappy???

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    @Shygaming I’m pretty sure that requiring consent from all participants in a scene is somewhat more important than maintaining the authenticity of your SA roleplay, and it’s concerning how the opt-out method you’ve provided is FTB aka “just let it happen”.

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    Code.

    For SA.

    Where are the games with coded SA, please, so I can avoid the hell out of them and anyone who thinks this is fine?

  • RE: Liberation Drama!?

    @MisterBoring said:

    @Wyrmsign Likely he finally upset the wrong subset of people.

    It doesn’t necessarily have to be a single event. It can be the culmination of many smaller incidents over time. It happens that way more often than we probably think it does.

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    @Pavel said:

    @MisterBoring said:

    What I do want is coded realistic injury treatment

    Sorry the code is stuck in female patient mode and it’s just suggesting you need to lose weight…

    This is when we cause realistic injury to the code.

  • RE: The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    @MisterBoring said:

    What I do want is coded realistic injury treatment

    Sorry the code is stuck in female patient mode and it’s just suggesting you need to lose weight…