@Colette said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:
To be entirely accurate one of the policy disagreements was that some of us felt that HAM was too slow to react to and too willing to overlook “borderline” problematic behaviour from players
Even ignoring everything else - and to be clear, everything else is also bullshit, everybody involved knew UH was run by sex pests and racists and didn’t care until Ruby went from being Claremont’s most virulent mouthpiece to falling out with him, the HAM split was a huge shitfit where Chaucer tried to take over and failed, this is the second or third or fourth game Chaucer has tried to make - making this claim while Vorpal is there is outright comedic.
This is a guy whose entire modern history is being an aggressively misogynistic piece of shit to anyone who disagrees with him and then getting away with it because he’s friends with Chaucer.
And I’ll attest from personal experience that Chaucer plays favorites. He played favorites with me, until I talked back to him. The second I lost his patronage I was persona non grata at HAM. Before that, he’d go over Shakespeare’s head to approve characters I made that she spent days arguing should never be allowed on the grid.
