Somehow, Kissinger is still alive…

BUT!

BRB making a few alt accounts to upvote all my own posts, since all you cowards refuse to give me enough microdoses of dopamine.

(:Public:) Ax (A) is curious what Kasia/Zephyr did that was bad enough to have not only her, but those people associated with her get their alts destroyed and their primary characters (some of who were on vacation) sent to the Old Guard Lounge and @passworded? Is that the new standard of dealing with people who investigate claims of sexual harassment here? Burn them and their associates? I’m just curious
(:Public:) Cujo says, “Ax, you don’t care about any of those things.”
(:Public:) Cujo says, “If you did, you’d put in a request to talk privately.”
(:Public:) Cujo says, “But you didn’t do that, you posted it publicly because you want to make a huge show of things.”
(:Public:) Cujo sayz, “So now you’re banned from this channel, well done.”

DO NOT SPEAK OUT, OR YOU WILL BE SILENCED, etc etc. Shocker.

@Pavel said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

@SqeakyClean said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

@DarthSmegma said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

The staff just imperiously announced ‘We’re skipping ahead fifteen years so that Rey and Ben Solo can have lots of babies! If you don’t like it, leave!’

Actually, it’s Rey and Poe’s babies on Age of Kora. Poe, played by Sumi’s player.

Still a better match IMHO.

POE IS MARRIED TO FINN, AND NOTHING JJ OR DISNEY SAYS WILL CONVINCE ME OTHERWISE.

Since Derp and Ghost keep bringing it up, I’ll repeat a point I’ve made before:

People are going to keep talking about the community being hijacked, because at the end of the day, before any of this happened, any of YOU who feel the need to talk about bullies being mean - YOU could have made your own board, and made it however you wanted.

Instead, you decided to change the rules of the board we were all on and throw anyone who disagreed out. Which is the root of it all. And you know it. Because you keep bringing up how we went somewhere else and made the rules we wanted.

And it’s pretty fucked up how you keep rewriting history to justify the decision.

Another person banned for person attacks, despite making fewer personal attacks than Ghost. Maybe it was the big words?

Of course, they had to ban @Kestrel. You showed up with receipts about their hypocrisy. 12/10. Would also upvote if I could.

@kalakh said in Bannings:

The new argument that this is merely the result of wanting more moderation and people are just mad that they are being moderated (because they’re super hypocrites and are now getting theirs), sure is a take.

People wanted moderation to fork threads or move them to different boards, and to ban the rapists or that one guy who sprouts up every couple months and tries to set everything on fire. So technically yes, more moderation was wanted.

But it is an extremely bad faith reading that the logical conclusion is ‘ban everyone who dares to speak out’. Pretty against the spirit of the job that was asked to be done, you might say.

@hobos said in Bannings:

I do care that VulgarKitten lied to those people, and I feel for them, particularly one who I personally admire who was really hurt by the lies. More importantly, she is sorry about it.

If she is actually sorry about it, perhaps she should admit that and apologize, and not pretend to be a totally different, literally new person, which fits the profile of the issues in the first place?

@helvetica said in Bannings:

@kalakh said in Bannings:

VK/Hella

I didn’t know who Hella was. lmaoooooo

Yeah, she literally changed her username and started pretending to be a new person right after the banning- spree, and nobody has called her out on it.

@Tat said in Bannings:

@Roadspike said in Bannings:

@farfalla Ares logs are system-created and (to my knowledge) can’t be edited. I would probably take a regular log too, but that would mean I was playing on a non-Ares game, and ain’t nobody got time to go technologically backwards.

Yeah, they can’t be edited unless you’re a coder, because they come straight from the database and not a player’s computer.

THAT JUST PROVES THE CODER IS IN ON THE CHEMTRAIL FLOURIDE CONSPIRACY TO MAKE PEOPLE LOOK BAD BECAUSE THEY ARE AN ENEMY OF THE CLIQUE!!!111!!1!ONE!!!111ELEVEN!

@Colette I am pro-Rogue, pro-bondage, pro-catsuit, and pro-sexy-times.

@Prototart was pointing out Rouge-players have traditionally used her powers as an excuse to hyperfixate on fetish/bondage RP that ‘tee-hee, kinky and saves people from dying while touching her’, and occasionally drift into a barely-legal area.

You mistook this to mean these players were giving her Bondage powers.

Also, the difference is spandex vs latex, obvs.

@helvetica said in Freeform or Systems?:

We can play different places.

No, we must all play on the singular Uber-Game.

@Wuff said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:

@Jennkryst said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:

@Colette said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:

Rogue with bondage powers

I think you keep confusing what people mean by this. Everyone agrees skin-to-skin contact with Rogue will drain powers. Its just the solution is always ‘put Rogue in a full body bondage-esque catsuit so there’s never skin to be touched’.

Few ever thinks to just put a restraining collar on her during day to day slice of life scenes. Like someone couldn’t make one aesthetically pleasing, or waterproof. People remembering that not only is she able to control her powers, but she isn’t even getting her flying brick power set from Carol Danvers any more either. Going with that is a breath of fresh air.

Well, yeah. You don’t have Danger Bondage Sexy Times if you do it that way!

I like a mix of both - dice for resolution of your stuff, but stick some narrative-bending things in the dice. Prime examples here are the FFG dice, both the Genesys rules and L5R.

@Colette said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:

Rogue with bondage powers

I think you keep confusing what people mean by this. Everyone agrees skin-to-skin contact with Rogue will drain powers. Its just the solution is always ‘put Rogue in a full body bondage-esque catsuit so there’s never skin to be touched’.

@EyeofProvidence said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:

@Purplelamia said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:

@Juniper You just have to do some manner of limbo to get through the door. Side-limbo

You put one huge boob in, you take one huge boob out, you put one huge boob in… but you don’t shake 'em because they weigh more than your ability to lift…

This is incredibly close.

You boob the first through the door breastily, give the door. Then get confused because there is something hard between them, so brain default to trying to get it off before you realize it is a door frame and it is unimpressed with your mad lewd skillz.

The next step is important - don’t go back in. Instead, you must…

… with the frame as your pivot-point.

Finally, you must breast boobily (like when you boob breastily, but in reverse) to finally free yourself from the door.

@MisterBoring said in Hello, Survey, and Looking for Recs:

@Pavel said in Hello, Survey, and Looking for Recs:

We have WoD. MUDders don’t. >_>

Haven of the Embraced is / was a thing.

And yet it was not called Haven: the Embraced? Fake fans.

@Colette said in What's up with the two Age of Heroes games?:

dredging up of ancient dramas over who slighted who in a game I probably never heard of a decade or more ago

I know Im late to the party, but…

@bear_necessities said in When is the last time you played?:

@catzilla said in When is the last time you played?:

run a silly one shot that will (probably) not have an effect on the setting.

so, curious, how could a game get you to run a plot that could have an effect on the setting, affect the metaplot or change the world in some sort of way? Is it just as simple as keeping that “You can do whatever you want here as long as it doesn’t break the world” on the tin or would you need something else?

Also not catzilla, but!

A way to help plot along is, perhaps, inject bureaucracy.

No, wait, let me explain before you run away!

For all of its other problems, a lack of plot allowances is not one that Shadowrun: Denver has. Because Shadowrun has quantifiable resources, you need cash for gear and rent and etc. You can’t just handwaive payments like you do with Resources or Wealth merits like you do with Chronicles or WoD or Exalted or [other example game].

Sure you could get cash to pay for things, but there is still an in-depth system used to purchase gear - so much that some players specifically made fixer PCs to do all the paperwork for other people.

This is Shadowrun in general. Denver adds detailed rules for players to circumvent this whole process and instead go get the SWAG themselves. Five Finger Discount style. Sure, you could go through the request process to get SWAG and wait (time). Or you can go PLOT for it and get it faster, and possibly cheaper.

@Ominous This erasure of our Sith Lord and Savior, Darth Darth Binks.