@NotSanni Ten bucks says this is the same guy who did this sad display a few weeks ago. This is totally alpha job-having behavior.
Not only do I have a job, but I can financially support multiple full-time shitposters to ridicule idiots on obscure web forums. You need to get on my level bitch nigga.
@InkGolem You write like a 49yo Hot Topic customer. Grow up, and address the points raised to you, or shut the fuck up. Otherwise I don’t care what you think.
EDIT: Well, the point wasn’t raised to you, but sao, but since you’re interchangeable and basically a hive mind the statement might as well apply to you as well.
@InkGolem It’s real flattering to know that I live in your head rent free to such an extent that you attribute all sane/correct opinions to me.
Pretending that commercial generative AI models aren’t walking databases of art theft is just disingenuous at this point. Like I think most of us have at least poked at them at this point, myself included, and I am not going to hate on people for yielding to the temptation to use the convenient and available thing, but let’s not engage in reality distortion about what this is.
Why do you leftists insist on having such retarded opinions? Generative AI models aren’t databases at all and characterizing them as such is factually wrong. Running matrix algebra on a bunch of image/caption pairs is not theft, you’re just unoriginal and nobody wants to pay for your CalArts genderblobs.
Your post is why only people who got real educations (your PhD on Gramsci’s foreskin doesn’t count) that require them to take Calc III should get to have an opinion on this topic.
