Liberation Drama!?
-
@Cygnus I understand. And I get it. I’ve actually been there myself, probably more times than I can remember. It just kind of sucks at the state of things.
-
Anyone else having issues trying to connect, or did I get stealth banned for some unknown reason in the month I haven’t really logged in?
️ Looking up address game.liberationmush.site:2020
️ Address is 5.161.78.92:2020, Connecting…
Error: No connection could be made because the target machine actively refused it. (0000274D)
️ Will try to reconnect in 30 secondsI can’t even get to the wiki pages.
-
@Alamias Game is still up and accessible for me.
-
@Cygnus’s numbered points are all true. Probably understated.
It’s not because Sundance is unavailable, though.
Sundance has stated that model world building is the kick she gets out of the game. It’s not like a novel. If it was a novel you’d get to see what’s going on. It’s like a scale railroad presented in a glass box full of fog. You see the lights go by from time to time. She’s having fun building the details you might glimpse.
And sure enough, a person can build a not-very-interactive model-world MU if they wants. It’s the thinking that such a thing is a good game that’s the error. Alas, Sundance appears to have fallen into the trap of only taking seriously those people who are least likely to criticise her. So she does that stuff listed in those numbered points because it protects/serves/maintains the model world following her plan/vision. She appears to take objections as just being haters who don’t think she’s allowed to have fun with her own game – her trusted group don’t criticise, so she can dismiss others who point out how that shit is not fun.
I disagree entirely about the OOC Masquerade policy, which is, like OOC masq everywhere, a Bad Idea, a Pain In The Ass, and a Boon To Bad Actors.
I also disagree about Sun’s interplayer conflict resolution, which I have invariably found to be either in service to maintaining the untouchableness of the model-world, or in service to claiming to have resolved the problem as fast as possible, or informed by The Fallacy of the Golden Mean (the notion that if there are two opposing viewpoints the truth always lies in the middle.)
-
@Gashlycrumb In all my years of gaming only one ST had the ignorance and nerve to attempt correcting me by telling me what my character would feel and how they would react. My character I’d been playing 8 years at that point, long before Lib. Then she ultimately would rather ban me and my partner than answer anything in a direct way, while simultaneously spamming the game with posts about how players are never to be trusted.
Trembling despot.
-
@Aria I can log in via cell phone, so it’s definitely something IP or provider related. I wonder if I was collateral damage in an IP ban or something…
-
@Alamias said in Liberation Drama!?:
@Aria I can log in via cell phone, so it’s definitely something IP or provider related. I wonder if I was collateral damage in an IP ban or something…
It’s possible. I have no idea who you played, but if you want to PM me, I can always ping a staffer the next time I see one online and try to ask.
-
@Gashlycrumb said in Liberation Drama!?:
And sure enough, a person can build a not-very-interactive model-world MU if they wants. It’s the thinking that such a thing is a good game that’s the error. Alas, Sundance appears to have fallen into the trap of only taking seriously those people who are least likely to criticise her. So she does that stuff listed in those numbered points because it protects/serves/maintains the model world following her plan/vision. She appears to take objections as just being haters who don’t think she’s allowed to have fun with her own game – her trusted group don’t criticise, so she can dismiss others who point out how that shit is not fun.
You’re describing a chicken/egg situation. Does she listen to the people that don’t criticize her? Or does she just make her own decisions? Then it just looks like she’s ignoring people that have a different opinion and listening to the people who agree. Its impossible to put yourself into someone else’s’ head. So you can only guess at what is actually happening. Either way, she should protect her world model. 100%. That’s not a bug, its a feature. Otherwise, you just end up with a chaotic mess of characters breaking shit in a game world that spins out of control quickly, because some/many/most players are greedy and ungrateful and nothing is ever enough for them.
I actually found Liberation to be very interactive (when it was active, years ago). The problem is that some players think they are entitled to win everything all the time and do whatever they want without consequences. And if they can’t, then it isn’t “fun”. There’s a reason the WoD and RL are so closely matched in terms of what the world looks like. There’s a reason the WoD isn’t a stark raving mad planet of supernatural creatures run amok terrorizing whoever they want with whatever they want whenever they want with God-kings and mortal slaves by the billions. There are absolutely people/individuals/things that can appear as if from nowhere and tell you to shut the fuck up, sit the fuck down and follow directions. And if you have an issue with that, then be prepared to lose your head. How else is it that the existence of all these 80 bajillion types of monsters have been kept unknown to most of the world for thousands of years? Ex. You think you’re the first vampire to ever think of ghouling the mayor? Get real. If it hasn’t happened already, there’s a strong reason for that. But it just isn’t feasible to play out those reasons on an constant ongoing basis in a way meaningful enough to remind players to stay in line. That’s what theme is for. To sum it all up and let you know how things work. You have to buy into the theme of the game or you’re gonna just keep running head first into walls, then trying to blame your frustration on the game runner.
NPCs aren’t always “unkillable” just because YOU can’t kill them. There’s just things out there that are higher up the food chain than PCs. Older, stronger, more powerful. And by orders of magnitude. Might makes right. They make the rules. They say what goes. So when they say stay out of the public eye or don’t use powers on public figures or don’t create a cult or don’t say the word ‘kazoo’ on Thursdays or whatever the hell rules they want: you follow the rules and keep things the way they want it or get stomped the fuck out. That’s not Sundance’s world model. That’s WoD’s world model. That’s just the setting of the game. And it is intended to be untouchable. WoD built a world model then directed you into very specific areas of play in different books that you have access to as a PC. You don’t get all of it, at least according to the setting of WoD. And by the nature of MU*s that throw everyone into one big mix of different books, what happens is up to the game runner. If you want to play outside of that sandbox, you need to go to a game that intends for that. If you want to take on characters that are thousands of years old with your 9 months of xp and expect to win, go to a game that will let you do something so silly.
TL:DR The game is what Sundance allows it to be - which is closer to what WoD is supposed to be than pretty much any WoD game since. If its not for you that doesn’t mean Sundance is doing it wrong. It just isn’t for you. Just find a different game. Or better yet, make your own game. Best of luck.
-
@Jynxbox I mean, just because all that’s true, doesn’t mean she’s not doing it wrong. She removed Glabro as a form from Garou for christsakes. That’s asinine and probably REALLY fucking petty.
-
@Jynxbox said in Liberation Drama!?:
TL:DR The game is what Sundance allows it to be - which is closer to what WoD is supposed to be than pretty much any WoD game since.
It’s 100% possible that she is doing WoD amazingly but totally mishandling the OOC logistical MU stuff that would exist if she was doing WoD, Star Trek, Animaniacs, or any other theme or ttrpg system.
