Suspected Superhero Creeping Or Something
-
@Tez said in DWOPP-spotting:
@Runescryer said in DWOPP-spotting:
Toxic behavior was observed.
I think this is where people are waiting with signs that say CITATION NEEDED.
-
@Runescryer The thing is, you proudly touted that you “HAD RECEIPTS” and made a big deal out of it, and then when you brought it out, what it looked like was you going “this character was mean to my character so this guy is a creep
:(”Frankly, I don’t think anybody looks good here, this is some of the most asinine drama to hit, but you were the one who went immediately “THIS MIGHT BE DWOPP” and stirred up that possibility. The person wasn’t. You jumped to one of the worst possible conclusions because … you didn’t like a potential way the story might go, because of a private scene?
and lord, we all know what I think of Lithium. I fully expect ZG had their reasons for the bans, and that they were based off of patterns of behavior. But you made a very specific accusation and then your evidence sucked.
-
@Runescryer said in DWOPP-spotting:
The community was alerted to be on guard, like a neighborhood being warned that someone’s house was broken into and the police are investigating. No names were disclosed. The investigation was allowed to proceed and was concluded.
Just to reiterate the main thrust of my point: That’s not what you did. You warned the neighbourhood that Charles Manson might be the one breaking into the houses.
The thread you started is actually titled “The All-New Down With OPP Thread.”
-
@IoleRae said in DWOPP-spotting:
I have been on the receiving end of Macha trying to make me interpret somebody else’s behavior as terrible before, so.
Yeah she seems to like doing that a lot.
-
@Coin I knew the Ares handle, because that’s always been in the profile. I didn’t know it was Lithium, because there was no indication of their MSB handle.
And while I don’t use my Ares handle, also @runescryer I believe, I’ve been open to players whose Ares handles match accounts that I recognize. I’ve approached a couple of players first, in that way.
-
I’d like to note that Charles Manson would never break into anyone’s house. He had minions for that.
I’ll see myself out.
-
@Runescryer said in DWOPP-spotting:
@Coin I knew the Ares handle, because that’s always been in the profile. I didn’t know it was Lithium, because there was no indication of their MSB handle.
And while I don’t use my Ares handle, also @runescryer I believe, I’ve been open to players whose Ares handles match accounts that I recognize. I’ve approached a couple of players first, in that way.
What are you even responding to? I’m lost.
Y’all, what is going on.
Mom, MOM.
-
@Coin time to go to bed. Did you wash behind your ears?
-
@Coin said in DWOPP-spotting:
Y’all, what is going on.
I dunno, but it better stop by the time I sober up.
-
@Pavel Again…
Please point out where I said that DOPP=Lithium?
-
@IoleRae Then I am probably projecting my perspective onto others, and I apologize.
-
@Runescryer said in DWOPP-spotting:
@Pavel Again…
Please point out where I said that DOPP=Lithium?
Y- are y- I just- what?
Did I take mushrooms by accident again?
-
You made it clear that you thought the person you were talking about was DWOPP. Just because you never named Lithium doesn’t mean that it wasn’t Lithium you were talking about.
ETA: also the fucking irony that this drama was over the possibility of spreading a rumor.
-
@Runescryer said in DWOPP-spotting:
@Pavel Again…
Please point out where I said that DOPP=Lithium?
You said that the anonymous person you were talking about might be DWOPP, titling a thread and saying “everyone’s favourite creeper” indicates this.
It was revealed that Lithium was the said anonymous person.
Ipso facto, you said that Lithium was displaying behaviour indistinguishable, to you, to that of DWOPP. Thus and therefore you equated the two individuals. Hence, you said they were the same.
-
@Coin Seriously. I mentioned DWOPP might be back. That’s it. I can accept the POV that I shouted FIRE in a theater, okay. But I never identified who might have started it. No, not Billy Joel.
Again, my POV…
Me: Someone’s smashing car windows in the neighborhood; we don’t know who and the police are investigating.
Unknown Window Smasher: HOW DARE YOU ACCUSE ME OF SMASHING WINDOWS!?!?
The consensus seems to be that we don’t want to alert people to potential threats, without naming names, because the person committing the offenses might get their feelings hurt when the investigation wraps up.
-
@Runescryer No, it was, “Hey, I think that guy over there IS SMASHING WINDOWS, and I BET HE’S OSAMA BIN LADEN. I have PROOF!”
and then you didn’t have proof.
-
@Pavel Who. Announced. It. Was. Lithium?
Please. Answer the question.
-
@Runescryer IT DOESN’T MATTER who announced it. You were talking shit about them even if they weren’t named, you piss-for-brains.
-
This is my omnipresent issue whenever someone starts shit and falls back on I DIDN’T NAME NAMES!!! The vast majority of the time it’s really easy to tell who someone’s talking about, or inferred, and it doesn’t seem to really do anything except make the person ‘not being named’ unable to argue back (though that’s been solved here lol).
-
@Selira I said an investigation was ongoing. I admitted there was no proof as of yet at the time being.
Again, Lithum self-identified himself. He was afforded the right to remain silent. He chose not to take it.
