MU Peeves Thread
-
@KDraygo
I don’t think that the majority opinion is that using ChatGPT is a great evil; I think the majority opinion is that many of us don’t enjoy it and want people who are using it to pose (or substantive portions of what it produces to help them pose) disclose that they are. That being said, I’m going to take issue with a few of your points for the sake of being contrary myself.my experience shows me that there are three major points I need to develop to contribute good writing to the stories being woven together with those I am RPing with.
I would argue that Mushing doesn’t call on you to contribute “good writing to the stories”. It calls on you to contribute fun to the community of players. How you are doing this is by writing in stories, but it’s also by vibes and a million other things, like showing up when you said you would.
My view on ChatGPT is that it’s a tool, one that can help a lot with part 2. [translating that creativity, imagination, thoughts, and ideas into written form that is both enjoyable and clear for everyone to read.]
I am again going to argue that “Part 2” is not about being “enjoyable and clear for everyone to read”. It is about being enjoyable to interact with. This is not the same thing. Many great writers are not enjoyable to interact with because they leave no air in the space. I think you get that, because you come on to Part 3, which is
being able to cooperate with the community in the game. Coordinating with the staff and cooperating to your fellow players to help create and develop these stories and adventures.
This is close, again, but it’s not quite right. You are not cooperating to create and develop stories. You’re collaborating to create fun.
Am I being pedantic? Maybe. but there is an important distinction here between creating “good stories” and “good writing” (which we’ll grant for the sake of argument that those are things that ChatGPT can actually do) and creating a good time, which is the actual point of playing on one of these games.
I’m not sure who will be wasting time having ChatGPT just come up with poses completely by itself and just copy pasting into the game, so to me, the concern may be a bit overblown.
I promise it’s happening. But on to my closing point:
So my “starting stats” into the hobby were probably a high part 1, low part 2, low part 3. […] The second part took years of not just reading but also RPing, going from a newbie RPer that wrote probably very cringe and rough poses to something that was more palatable to everyone.
This is part of the journey, it’s part of the fun, it’s part of the magic of these games. Outsourcing the writing means you never get better. You never look back and laugh at your own cringe moments. You never track your progress and appreciate that you haven’t just been dicking around online, you’ve actually bettered yourself in some way. You weren’t just part of a cycle of regurgitating content, you created something, however meager. Studies have already shown that using ChatGPT to help you write something makes you less creative and less engaged, which sort of bumps up against your optimism about “Part 1”.
Do you think it’s fair that people ask AI users to disclose it?
he/him
this machine kills fascists -
Can we consolidate all our AI conversation into one big, or at least split off, AI thread? Not every discussion needs to turn into “Here’s my opinion on AI” again, and again, and again.
-
@Trashcan’s got it. Spot on and according to Hoyle and so on.
@Trashcan said in MU Peeves Thread:
Do you think it’s fair that people ask AI users to disclose it?
It’s not unfair to ask, but you know they won’t do it.
-
@bear_necessities said in MU Peeves Thread:
Also I ran a bunch of my poses through ChatGPT and asked if AI wrote it and it said it was debatable and so maybe I’m just secretly a robot.
Yeah, I don’t think anyone is asking the idiot machine if it wrote people’s poses. You’d get better results from a magic 8-ball.
-
I don’t spend too much thought worrying about if someone used an LLM to write their poses, their desc, or anything. I just ask myself ‘was this person fun to scene with’ and ‘do I want to scene with this person again’.
I suspect, if I’ve had LLM RP, my answers to the latter two questions are ‘no’ more often than they’re yes. And I don’t need to know that it’s because it’s an LLM: people have been boring and incoherent posers for decades without help. LLMs just, honestly, make the pablum spelled correctly and with better grammar.
(And, if anyone’s worried about being seen as posing-by-LLM, just focus on being reactive and attentive to other people’s characters and really present in the vibe of the scene, and you should be fine, more often than not. No one has ever said, “OMG, I had so much fun RPing with this person…what if they were using AI??”)
-
@Trashcan said in MU Peeves Thread:
It calls on you to contribute fun to the community of players.
https://youtu.be/0FNZfR4bGw4?si=8GD4M9l1v_JAXux3
Fun, fun, fun
It’s the finest thing under the sun
Now we all need it badly
So help yourselves madly
For fun, fun, funFun, fun, fun
It’s a must since the world first begun
For there’s no doubt about it
You can’t live without it
It’s fun, fun, funThe birds in the trees
All the birds and the fleas
And the spiders when their webs are spun
Even rabbits and mices they all have devices
For fun, fun, funEveryone, one, one
Will have soon got the blues on the run
If from Jan to December
They’ll all be remembered
As fun, fun, funLet’s have fun…
-
@Pyrephox What if we RP’d about becoming AI’s IC? A transhumanism plot, etc.
full circle gif here
-
@dvoraen said in MU Peeves Thread:
What if we RP’d about becoming AI’s IC? A transhumanism plot, etc.
This gives me an idea for a Transhuman Sci-Fi MU where several NPCs are AI played by AI.
-
Not really what the conversation is about, but to find out if it’s AI, you post it to AI and basically say: Did you do this?
I don’t know why, but I find that both sad and completely hilarious.
-
@RightMeow said in MU Peeves Thread:
Not really what the conversation is about, but to find out if it’s AI, you post it to AI and basically say: Did you do this?
I don’t know why, but I find that both sad and completely hilarious.
And then the LLM gets it wrong, because it doesn’t actually know how to analyze anything.
-
@RightMeow said in MU Peeves Thread:
I don’t know why, but I find that both sad and completely hilarious.
There are a couple times I’ve gotten an LLM to almost 90% replicate what someone has ‘posed’ or ‘written’ (LLM’d) on a MUSH by using a prompt that was more or less asking for the same thing. It is, indeed, both hilarious and maddening.
