AI In Poses
-
@Faraday The tools work OK from what I’ve seen (as has been mentioned on other threads, Turnitin has modules for this). What it does is flag it as possible - the human has to do some leg work. With essays, for example, you might look at a mini viva. M**s have a pretty low bar, the cost of being booted off the game is…you don’t get to play on that game. That’s all.
-
Oh also, people using GenAI in this way absolutely should be shunned. It is crass slop that is fucking up a lot of things, and the sooner the bubble bursts the slightly less screwed we will all be. There are really specific use cases for GenAI - but it is expensive tech, and those use cases don’t need everyone to be using it. Hopefully they’ll get onto AI that actually learns at some point.
-
@catzilla said in AI In Poses:
At least it made me aware that people are doing copy and paste of AI in their writings/backgrounds/etc.
I have legit seen people copy AI slop into their backgrounds and forget to take the AI chatter out, so at the end it’s like
Would you like a more dramatic, literary option next?It would be extremely funny if it was on purpose, but I’m very sure it wasn’t.
@hellfrog said in AI In Poses:
It’s not just that LLM writing is hollow, bloated, and uninteresting (though it is), it’s also a breach of that fundamental contract to use it. I have always told people if they aren’t in it to have fun AND make fun for their scene partners, they need a new hobby. If you are using LLMs you are not engaged and you certainly aren’t trying to be fun to rp with.
+1000.
Also +1000 to @Faraday’s point that you cannot trust AI detectors to detect AI. They just absolutely are not trustable, and I think human intuition of “wait, this writing feels wordy and bland and disconnected from what’s actually happening in the scene” is both more accurate and more useful right now, because if a person isn’t using AI but does sound wordy and bland and disconnected from the scene, that’s still worth checking in about. (Mostly the disconnected “are you even reading this scene” part. I too am sometimes bland and wordy all by my human self, but at least I’m blandly and wordily responding to the scene.)
-
Regardless of whether I agree (morally, ethically, whatever) with the use of AI, out in the real world I can understand it: You want to make a buck, get a grade, or otherwise achieve something that’s difficult with as little effort as possible. I get that.
But… creativity and writing are the entire goddamn point(s) of the kind of RP we do. If you want to use Grammarly or something like that to catch typos and comma placement, that’s totally fine, but to use an LLM to do the creative bit is so alien an idea to me that I’d probably never even suspect a person of doing it. I’d probably just think they’re boring, or ESL, or ESL and boring.
-
@Clarion said in AI In Poses:
Also +1000 to @Faraday’s point that you cannot trust AI detectors to detect AI. They just absolutely are not trustable, and I think human intuition of “wait, this writing feels wordy and bland and disconnected from what’s actually happening in the scene” is both more accurate and more useful right now, because if a person isn’t using AI but does sound wordy and bland and disconnected from the scene, that’s still worth checking in about.
On a personal level I agree with and I’m guided primarily by my intuition as I try to navigate this stuff. When I pull up a detector it’s to have a second sanity check. Because what else have we got, ya know? The idea of relying purely on my feels is worse to me, because I think it does open the door to people get way too confident about being The Em Dash Police with people they haven’t played with much, while being totally blind to their buddy who’s writing style suddenly morphs into nine paragraph purple sycophancy. It also feels very easy to invalidate when someone says, ‘Well it looks fine to me! Who cares lol’ I mean…maybe it is fine? And plenty of people don’t care, which is all well and good and they can figure that out for themselves. But I do care! And I am trying to navigate this stuff.
I also don’t think players should be getting into ‘nu-uh’ fights about this among themselves while staff is just hands off. I increasingly want a game to be very clear on what its stance on AI is because players policing this themselves is a fucking nightmare. If staff doesn’t allow LLM writing, players should respect that, and potential LLM posers should imo be reported so staff can sort it out with whatever process they manage to cobble together. If a game straight-up doesn’t care they should say they straight-up don’t care and people should leave it be, and then players can decide for themselves whether the environment is OK with them.
I want something else to get me through this
Semi-charmed kinda life, baby, baby
I want something else, I'm not listening when you say good-byeShe/Her or They/Them
-
OK genuine question because I couldn’t find anything with a quick search and was too lazy to dive deep, but…
Don’t AI detectors also use LLMs? And couldn’t they then be training on the stuff they’re scanning?
If so, by putting poses into them, I could potentially be using other peoples’ RP to feed the very machine I hate so much.
-
@Faraday
This is a question about the individual service, not the entire category. For instance, Pangram’s policy:Pangram does not train generalized AI models like ChatGPT, and our AI detection technology is based off of a large, proprietary dataset that doesn’t include user submitted content.
We train an initial model on a small but diverse dataset of approximately 1 million documents comprised of public and licensed human-written text. The dataset also includes AI-generated text produced by GPT-4 and other frontier language models. The result of training is a neural network capable of reliably predicting whether text was authored by human or AI.
If you refuse to use any technology that relies on machine learning, algorithms, or neural networks regardless of the specifics then obviously that is your prerogative but you are going to have a hard time using the internet at all.
-
@Trashcan said in AI In Poses:
If you refuse to use any technology that relies on machine learning, algorithms, or neural networks regardless of the specifics then obviously that is your prerogative but you are going to have a hard time using the internet at all.
Yes, that would be ridiculous, and is not even remotely close to anything I’ve said. I have literally worked on ML software to identify cancer cells on digital pathology scans and categorize covid risks. My objection is to LLMs trained on material without compensation or consent, designed to replace creative folks with crappy knockoffs.
I just asked if someone knew off-hand how these detector tools worked because I couldn’t find the info quickly myself. Not all of them in existence, but the prominent ones at least.
-
@Third-Eye said in AI In Poses:
I increasingly want a game to be very clear on what its stance on AI is because players policing this themselves is a fucking nightmare.
Yeah I’d agree, this is something that staff should be on top of, one way or another. Any situation that dips into accusation drama would be a player problem and should be dealt with accordingly.
-
@Yam Something like “Using LLMs/AI for any contributions to the game, including but not limited to backgrounds, descriptions, wiki images, poses, etc, is a bannable offence. Being a dick if you suspect someone of using LLMs/AI is also a bannable offence.”
