Locking threads

[Pavel]

@sao I was definitely over-zealous in my desire to stop talking about the other place, so it’s entirely on me.

[Jennkryst]

@sao said in Locking threads:

Wow, look at that. A mod reacted to criticism by listening to reason and reversing an action.

UNPRECEDENTED!

Edit: FUCK, I quoted the wrong thing the first time!

[Roz]

I can actually understand a general desire to have the MSB drama consolidated a bit, because some people are definitely not gonna want to linger in it and will want to just move on, and limited threads means stuff is easy to set to ignore. But we can probably just manage that as general users as everything starts to settle in and get comfy in a new environment.

[Pavel]

@Roz said in Locking threads:

But we can probably just manage that as general users

But how can I make you guys understand how cool I am if I don’t abu-I mean use my minuscule amounts of power?

[Jennkryst]

@Pavel said in Locking threads:

@Roz said in Locking threads:

But we can probably just manage that as general users

But how can I make you guys understand how cool I am if I don’t abu-I mean use my minuscule amounts of power?

Become a TS-FIEND

[Third Eye]

@Roz said in Locking threads:

I can actually understand a general desire to have the MSB drama consolidated a bit, because some people are definitely not gonna want to linger in it and will want to just move on, and limited threads means stuff is easy to set to ignore. But we can probably just manage that as general users as everything starts to settle in and get comfy in a new environment.

Yeah I feel this myself It made me a bit gun-shy about posting too much at first (though some of that it just not being active on a MU at the moment), though it’s been cool to see familiar names pop up and it’s definitely cathartic to laugh about it. There’s a happy medium we can all of us find in time.

[bear_necessities]

The threads about MSB will die down in a week or so as people get more distance from the situation (assuming, of course, nothing else blows up over there lol). Locking threads should really be used very very sparingly and only in the event that rules are being egregiously broken. Let the community decide what threads to participate in, what threads not to, and what threads will inevitably die.

[Tez]

Hi, guys:

YOU ARE RIGHT. When we permanently lock a thread, it will be a majority decision from the admin. And we’ll say it’s a decision from all of us and why we are making it.

If a thread DOES seem like it MIGHT need a cool down, then that will receive a temporary lock, which will ALSO be clearly called, but that is a decision that CAN be made by a single admin.

There won’t be any haha just kidding admin trolling of fake-locking threads. Transparency is important to me. HELLA IMPORTANT.

[Narson]

@Tez said in Locking threads:

There won’t be any haha just kidding admin trolling of fake-locking threads. Transparency is important to me. HELLA IMPORTANT.

You say this, but I see right through you.

[Snackness]

@Narson BANNED.

[tsar]

@Snackness

[Rathenhope]

@Narson said in Locking threads:

@Tez said in Locking threads:

There won’t be any haha just kidding admin trolling of fake-locking threads. Transparency is important to me. HELLA IMPORTANT.

You say this, but I see right through over you.

FTFY

[Tez]

@Rathenhope