Brand MU Day
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rough and Rowdy
    1.2k Posts 99 Posters 484.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • J
      Jax
      last edited by

      Merek wasn’t enabled on Aoa. If anything he was belittled and ignored. I don’t know about him being a sex pest there or other places.

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • PavelP
        Pavel @shit-piss-love
        last edited by

        @shit-piss-love said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

        If part of the point of hashing out these tales in public is to warn people about creepers, should this convo re: Merek be spun off to a so-titled post of its own?

        Honestly? From my brief skim of that vague MSB discussion, from three years ago about an event that happened over a year before that, it seems that he had a rather inappropriate request, was rejected, and respected that boundary.

        So perhaps we can talk about something more recent, and less vague?

        He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
        BE AN ADULT

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
        • S
          SpilledBeanz
          last edited by

          throws some red meat, to get things back on track!

          AoA staff just wiped the nom counts of most of the banned players, so that Hadrix & Co can bask in the glory of being best. They must feel so proud of themselves.

          (The point being the players that were ousted were the game’s best, with the nom counts that went along with that).

          Suck it, aoa. You’re a dying game.

          PavelP D K 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 9
          • PavelP
            Pavel @SpilledBeanz
            last edited by

            @SpilledBeanz liberty dies

            He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
            BE AN ADULT

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
            • IoleRaeI
              IoleRae
              last edited by

              I mean they’re doing a great job of representing their source material.

              the entity previously known as Sunny

              PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
              • PavelP
                Pavel @IoleRae
                last edited by

                @IoleRae said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                I mean they’re doing a great job of representing their source material.

                Yeah, they also demonstrate that Star Wars is only really good when an unsung woman (and presumably a team under her direction) did a bunch of work in editing because the men weren’t that great at writing.

                He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                BE AN ADULT

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                • D
                  Drowsy @SpilledBeanz
                  last edited by

                  @SpilledBeanz
                  It’s worth noting that ONLY the people who were on the noms list had their noms wiped. They aren’t even hiding it well lol

                  Before:
                  75d97cef-2165-470d-9009-ebfe187c7a14-image.png

                  After:
                  c903f883-1044-49bb-a8ce-846792454990-image.png

                  ALSO the guy that they were so proud of banning was still on the noms board until this. So, this “banning policy that has always been there” (which magically was enacted to ban everyone suspected of involvement or guilty of checks notes being angry that this harassment occurred) didn’t apply to David Ironsides - who was sending people sexual images a YEAR AGO - until they pulled this.

                  They were quicker to take action against the staffer who moved against predators than they were the actual predators. They were quicker to take action against people who said “uhhhh this seriously happened and y’all didn’t care???” or who were simply ASSOCIATED with the people who moved against predators than they were the predators.

                  So much for “Standard procedure”.

                  PaxP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 8
                  • PaxP
                    Pax @Drowsy
                    last edited by

                    @Drowsy That this is called “Cujo’s Cup” – the jokes are writing themselves.

                    I wish you would.

                    BloodAngelB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                    • BloodAngelB
                      BloodAngel @Pax
                      last edited by

                      @Pax cujo cup

                      PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                      • PavelP
                        Pavel @BloodAngel
                        last edited by

                        @BloodAngel jockstrap

                        This is more the angle I was thinking about ‘cup’. But, you know, that’s the angle I’m always thinking.

                        He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                        BE AN ADULT

                        BloodAngelB Z 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                        • BloodAngelB
                          BloodAngel @Pavel
                          last edited by

                          @Pavel Well done.

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • J
                            Jax
                            last edited by

                            Wow 2805 is a lot of +noms. It’s not 3089 +nom impressive.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                            • B
                              Bessarion @mietze
                              last edited by

                              @mietze I was not implying that he wasn’t capable of being sexually inappropriate, but rather that given my own experience with him, it felt out of character and the commentary felt like punching down. I have since been corrected in my understanding.

                              I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                              • IoleRaeI
                                IoleRae
                                last edited by IoleRae

                                Perhaps the default assumption, in relation to instances of sexual abuse, should not be “bitches be lying” or “bitches be mistaken” when it’s brought up, even if an individual personally did not experience it. Can we perhaps not do that? Fucking please?

                                the entity previously known as Sunny

                                B bear_necessitiesB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • PaxP
                                  Pax
                                  last edited by

                                  oop

                                  I wish you would.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • B
                                    Bessarion @IoleRae
                                    last edited by

                                    @IoleRae Yeah, that was my bad and it’s not cool. I genuinely thought they were mixing people up, and even if that was the case, I shouldn’t have said anything unless I knew for sure that they weren’t.

                                    I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                                    IoleRaeI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • IoleRaeI
                                      IoleRae @Bessarion
                                      last edited by

                                      @Bessarion said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                                      @IoleRae Yeah, that was my bad and it’s not cool. I genuinely thought they were mixing people up, and even if that was the case, I shouldn’t have said anything unless I knew for sure that they weren’t.

                                      You’re not the only one that did it, but I REALLY appreciate the self-awareness and acknowledgment. Even I pull this shit sometimes, it’s really damn engrained.

                                      the entity previously known as Sunny

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                      • Z
                                        Zephyr @Pavel
                                        last edited by

                                        @Pavel said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                                        @BloodAngel jockstrap

                                        This is more the angle I was thinking about ‘cup’. But, you know, that’s the angle I’m always thinking.

                                        You’re not wrong. Each nom level had a description, and Cujo’s Cup said something like “Think about it” as its description.

                                        PaxP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                        • PaxP
                                          Pax @Zephyr
                                          last edited by

                                          @Zephyr said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                                          You’re not wrong. Each nom level had a description, and Cujo’s Cup said something like “Think about it” as its description.

                                          gross

                                          I wish you would.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                          • B
                                            Bessarion
                                            last edited by

                                            Seeing the name Adhar reminds me that he was a creep, but I can’t remember why.

                                            I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                            • First post
                                              Last post