Brand MU Day
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rough and Rowdy
    1.2k Posts 99 Posters 484.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • WizzW
      Wizz @bear_necessities
      last edited by

      @bear_necessities said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

      Especially since no one is even sure that this conversation even happened about him on MSB?

      I understand why you would be doubtful and why it would be uncomfortable for people to go back and search especially if their accounts are banned, so here is the post.

      RozR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
      • RozR
        Roz @Wizz
        last edited by

        @Wizz said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

        @bear_necessities said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

        Especially since no one is even sure that this conversation even happened about him on MSB?

        I understand why you would be doubtful and why it would be uncomfortable for people to go back and search especially if their accounts are banned, so here is the post.

        Thank you for linking. I’m not shy about going back onto MSB, but you literally can’t use the search function without an account, so I – can’t search on it, lol. (I can do a Google search with the site: function, but nothing came up for this, so I think maybe the pages aren’t scraped.)

        she/her | playlist

        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 5
        • shit-piss-loveS
          shit-piss-love
          last edited by

          If part of the point of hashing out these tales in public is to warn people about creepers, should this convo re: Merek be spun off to a so-titled post of its own?

          PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
          • M
            mietze @Bessarion
            last edited by mietze

            @Bessarion my first job out of college was managing a group home for adults with cognitive disabilities. It is really important to not infantize adults. Just because someone needs that level of care does not mean that they don’t have sexual feelings and cannot act out sexually. The reality is that I did have to do a lot of coordination with other habilitation counselors as well as occupation folks and also monitor in house with 2 of my guys in particular that struggled with appropriate behavior. And we did not have internet!

            I would never dismiss someone capacity to be invasive and inappropriate in sexual interest and communication because they live in an adult group home. Many adults are interested in sex/sexuality is important/they have drive. Just because someone has cognitive or emotional impairments doesn’t mean that they don’t.

            And it is very very important that we don’t say to people who have been encroached on that they should tolerate it more because of the person targeting them has a certain life circumstance. Or are they sure that person is capable of it.

            B 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 11
            • J
              Jax
              last edited by

              Merek wasn’t enabled on Aoa. If anything he was belittled and ignored. I don’t know about him being a sex pest there or other places.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
              • PavelP
                Pavel @shit-piss-love
                last edited by

                @shit-piss-love said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                If part of the point of hashing out these tales in public is to warn people about creepers, should this convo re: Merek be spun off to a so-titled post of its own?

                Honestly? From my brief skim of that vague MSB discussion, from three years ago about an event that happened over a year before that, it seems that he had a rather inappropriate request, was rejected, and respected that boundary.

                So perhaps we can talk about something more recent, and less vague?

                He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                BE AN ADULT

                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • S
                  SpilledBeanz
                  last edited by

                  throws some red meat, to get things back on track!

                  AoA staff just wiped the nom counts of most of the banned players, so that Hadrix & Co can bask in the glory of being best. They must feel so proud of themselves.

                  (The point being the players that were ousted were the game’s best, with the nom counts that went along with that).

                  Suck it, aoa. You’re a dying game.

                  PavelP D K 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 9
                  • PavelP
                    Pavel @SpilledBeanz
                    last edited by

                    @SpilledBeanz liberty dies

                    He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                    BE AN ADULT

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                    • IoleRaeI
                      IoleRae
                      last edited by

                      I mean they’re doing a great job of representing their source material.

                      the entity previously known as Sunny

                      PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • PavelP
                        Pavel @IoleRae
                        last edited by

                        @IoleRae said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                        I mean they’re doing a great job of representing their source material.

                        Yeah, they also demonstrate that Star Wars is only really good when an unsung woman (and presumably a team under her direction) did a bunch of work in editing because the men weren’t that great at writing.

                        He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                        BE AN ADULT

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
                        • D
                          Drowsy @SpilledBeanz
                          last edited by

                          @SpilledBeanz
                          It’s worth noting that ONLY the people who were on the noms list had their noms wiped. They aren’t even hiding it well lol

                          Before:
                          75d97cef-2165-470d-9009-ebfe187c7a14-image.png

                          After:
                          c903f883-1044-49bb-a8ce-846792454990-image.png

                          ALSO the guy that they were so proud of banning was still on the noms board until this. So, this “banning policy that has always been there” (which magically was enacted to ban everyone suspected of involvement or guilty of checks notes being angry that this harassment occurred) didn’t apply to David Ironsides - who was sending people sexual images a YEAR AGO - until they pulled this.

                          They were quicker to take action against the staffer who moved against predators than they were the actual predators. They were quicker to take action against people who said “uhhhh this seriously happened and y’all didn’t care???” or who were simply ASSOCIATED with the people who moved against predators than they were the predators.

                          So much for “Standard procedure”.

                          PaxP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 8
                          • PaxP
                            Pax @Drowsy
                            last edited by

                            @Drowsy That this is called “Cujo’s Cup” – the jokes are writing themselves.

                            I wish you would.

                            BloodAngelB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                            • BloodAngelB
                              BloodAngel @Pax
                              last edited by

                              @Pax cujo cup

                              PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                              • PavelP
                                Pavel @BloodAngel
                                last edited by

                                @BloodAngel jockstrap

                                This is more the angle I was thinking about ‘cup’. But, you know, that’s the angle I’m always thinking.

                                He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                                BE AN ADULT

                                BloodAngelB Z 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • BloodAngelB
                                  BloodAngel @Pavel
                                  last edited by

                                  @Pavel Well done.

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • J
                                    Jax
                                    last edited by

                                    Wow 2805 is a lot of +noms. It’s not 3089 +nom impressive.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                    • B
                                      Bessarion @mietze
                                      last edited by

                                      @mietze I was not implying that he wasn’t capable of being sexually inappropriate, but rather that given my own experience with him, it felt out of character and the commentary felt like punching down. I have since been corrected in my understanding.

                                      I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • IoleRaeI
                                        IoleRae
                                        last edited by IoleRae

                                        Perhaps the default assumption, in relation to instances of sexual abuse, should not be “bitches be lying” or “bitches be mistaken” when it’s brought up, even if an individual personally did not experience it. Can we perhaps not do that? Fucking please?

                                        the entity previously known as Sunny

                                        B bear_necessitiesB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                        • PaxP
                                          Pax
                                          last edited by

                                          oop

                                          I wish you would.

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • B
                                            Bessarion @IoleRae
                                            last edited by

                                            @IoleRae Yeah, that was my bad and it’s not cool. I genuinely thought they were mixing people up, and even if that was the case, I shouldn’t have said anything unless I knew for sure that they weren’t.

                                            I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                                            IoleRaeI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                                            • First post
                                              Last post