Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo
-
@SpilledBeanz
It’s worth noting that ONLY the people who were on the noms list had their noms wiped. They aren’t even hiding it well lolBefore:
After:
ALSO the guy that they were so proud of banning was still on the noms board until this. So, this “banning policy that has always been there” (which magically was enacted to ban everyone suspected of involvement or guilty of checks notes being angry that this harassment occurred) didn’t apply to David Ironsides - who was sending people sexual images a YEAR AGO - until they pulled this.
They were quicker to take action against the staffer who moved against predators than they were the actual predators. They were quicker to take action against people who said “uhhhh this seriously happened and y’all didn’t care???” or who were simply ASSOCIATED with the people who moved against predators than they were the predators.
So much for “Standard procedure”.
-
@Drowsy That this is called “Cujo’s Cup” – the jokes are writing themselves.
-
-
This is more the angle I was thinking about ‘cup’. But, you know, that’s the angle I’m always thinking.
He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
BE AN ADULT -
@Pavel Well done.
-
Wow 2805 is a lot of +noms. It’s not 3089 +nom impressive.
-
@mietze I was not implying that he wasn’t capable of being sexually inappropriate, but rather that given my own experience with him, it felt out of character and the commentary felt like punching down. I have since been corrected in my understanding.
-
Perhaps the default assumption, in relation to instances of sexual abuse, should not be “bitches be lying” or “bitches be mistaken” when it’s brought up, even if an individual personally did not experience it. Can we perhaps not do that? Fucking please?
the entity previously known as Sunny
-
-
@IoleRae Yeah, that was my bad and it’s not cool. I genuinely thought they were mixing people up, and even if that was the case, I shouldn’t have said anything unless I knew for sure that they weren’t.
-
@Bessarion said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:
@IoleRae Yeah, that was my bad and it’s not cool. I genuinely thought they were mixing people up, and even if that was the case, I shouldn’t have said anything unless I knew for sure that they weren’t.
You’re not the only one that did it, but I REALLY appreciate the self-awareness and acknowledgment. Even I pull this shit sometimes, it’s really damn engrained.
-
@Pavel said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:
This is more the angle I was thinking about ‘cup’. But, you know, that’s the angle I’m always thinking.
You’re not wrong. Each nom level had a description, and Cujo’s Cup said something like “Think about it” as its description.
-
@Zephyr said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:
You’re not wrong. Each nom level had a description, and Cujo’s Cup said something like “Think about it” as its description.
-
Seeing the name Adhar reminds me that he was a creep, but I can’t remember why.
-
@IoleRae wanting a conversation about someone being pitiful/pathetic and potentially mentally disabled to end is not the same as dismissing someone’s complaint about sexual harassment. @Wizz provided a link to the complaint (which, thank you, because I can’t search MSB) and if the conversation wants to focus there then that is fine.
-
Can we just go back to talking about the ‘Do Not Arx’ image?
That was a bit more fun less uncomfortable.
-
I wasn’t aware before this thread that he was cognitively impaired. That explains quite a lot about his other behaviors, and in that light my laughing at them was in pretty poor taste, and I’m sorry. @bear_necessities and @Bessarion were right to come to his defense and point that out. I said what I felt like I needed to say about where his inappropriate behavior crosses a line and @mietze explained how that isn’t excused by disability and that you shouldn’t hesitate to maintain boundaries just because someone is disabled, and that’s probably just a good place to leave it imo.
-
@Wizz I just want to make it clear that I am definitely not defending any inappropriate sexual behavior and am not defending this person at all for those behaviors. The initial commentary wasn’t about any of those things and that’s what made me uncomfortable.
-
-
@Wizz I wasn’t aware, either, and I agree on all of the above counts, and with Jax’s last. Having dealt with people with cognitive impairments IRL, I have no intent or reason to belittle or ignore them, and do my best to respect and work well with them.
I also won’t deny that this is often EXHAUSTING and always some degree of frustrating. Recent experiences with a now former coworker have reminded me of that. Mad respect to people who do this for a living, as volunteers, or simply out of the goodness of their own hearts.
