Brand MU Day
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rough and Rowdy
    1.2k Posts 99 Posters 484.4k Views
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • PavelP
      Pavel @SpilledBeanz
      last edited by

      @SpilledBeanz liberty dies

      He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
      BE AN ADULT

      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
      • IoleRaeI
        IoleRae
        last edited by

        I mean they’re doing a great job of representing their source material.

        the entity previously known as Sunny

        PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
        • PavelP
          Pavel @IoleRae
          last edited by

          @IoleRae said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

          I mean they’re doing a great job of representing their source material.

          Yeah, they also demonstrate that Star Wars is only really good when an unsung woman (and presumably a team under her direction) did a bunch of work in editing because the men weren’t that great at writing.

          He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
          BE AN ADULT

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 6
          • D
            Drowsy @SpilledBeanz
            last edited by

            @SpilledBeanz
            It’s worth noting that ONLY the people who were on the noms list had their noms wiped. They aren’t even hiding it well lol

            Before:
            75d97cef-2165-470d-9009-ebfe187c7a14-image.png

            After:
            c903f883-1044-49bb-a8ce-846792454990-image.png

            ALSO the guy that they were so proud of banning was still on the noms board until this. So, this “banning policy that has always been there” (which magically was enacted to ban everyone suspected of involvement or guilty of checks notes being angry that this harassment occurred) didn’t apply to David Ironsides - who was sending people sexual images a YEAR AGO - until they pulled this.

            They were quicker to take action against the staffer who moved against predators than they were the actual predators. They were quicker to take action against people who said “uhhhh this seriously happened and y’all didn’t care???” or who were simply ASSOCIATED with the people who moved against predators than they were the predators.

            So much for “Standard procedure”.

            PaxP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 8
            • PaxP
              Pax @Drowsy
              last edited by

              @Drowsy That this is called “Cujo’s Cup” – the jokes are writing themselves.

              I wish you would.

              BloodAngelB 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
              • BloodAngelB
                BloodAngel @Pax
                last edited by

                @Pax cujo cup

                PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                • PavelP
                  Pavel @BloodAngel
                  last edited by

                  @BloodAngel jockstrap

                  This is more the angle I was thinking about ‘cup’. But, you know, that’s the angle I’m always thinking.

                  He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.
                  BE AN ADULT

                  BloodAngelB Z 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                  • BloodAngelB
                    BloodAngel @Pavel
                    last edited by

                    @Pavel Well done.

                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                    • J
                      Jax
                      last edited by

                      Wow 2805 is a lot of +noms. It’s not 3089 +nom impressive.

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                      • B
                        Bessarion @mietze
                        last edited by

                        @mietze I was not implying that he wasn’t capable of being sexually inappropriate, but rather that given my own experience with him, it felt out of character and the commentary felt like punching down. I have since been corrected in my understanding.

                        I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                        • IoleRaeI
                          IoleRae
                          last edited by IoleRae

                          Perhaps the default assumption, in relation to instances of sexual abuse, should not be “bitches be lying” or “bitches be mistaken” when it’s brought up, even if an individual personally did not experience it. Can we perhaps not do that? Fucking please?

                          the entity previously known as Sunny

                          B bear_necessitiesB 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 3
                          • PaxP
                            Pax
                            last edited by

                            oop

                            I wish you would.

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                            • B
                              Bessarion @IoleRae
                              last edited by

                              @IoleRae Yeah, that was my bad and it’s not cool. I genuinely thought they were mixing people up, and even if that was the case, I shouldn’t have said anything unless I knew for sure that they weren’t.

                              I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                              IoleRaeI 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 2
                              • IoleRaeI
                                IoleRae @Bessarion
                                last edited by

                                @Bessarion said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                                @IoleRae Yeah, that was my bad and it’s not cool. I genuinely thought they were mixing people up, and even if that was the case, I shouldn’t have said anything unless I knew for sure that they weren’t.

                                You’re not the only one that did it, but I REALLY appreciate the self-awareness and acknowledgment. Even I pull this shit sometimes, it’s really damn engrained.

                                the entity previously known as Sunny

                                1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                • Z
                                  Zephyr @Pavel
                                  last edited by

                                  @Pavel said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                                  @BloodAngel jockstrap

                                  This is more the angle I was thinking about ‘cup’. But, you know, that’s the angle I’m always thinking.

                                  You’re not wrong. Each nom level had a description, and Cujo’s Cup said something like “Think about it” as its description.

                                  PaxP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                  • PaxP
                                    Pax @Zephyr
                                    last edited by

                                    @Zephyr said in Star Wars Age of Alliances: Hadrix and Cujo:

                                    You’re not wrong. Each nom level had a description, and Cujo’s Cup said something like “Think about it” as its description.

                                    gross

                                    I wish you would.

                                    1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
                                    • B
                                      Bessarion
                                      last edited by

                                      Seeing the name Adhar reminds me that he was a creep, but I can’t remember why.

                                      I am/was tek. If this means something to you, do as you see fit with this knowledge.

                                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • bear_necessitiesB
                                        bear_necessities @IoleRae
                                        last edited by

                                        @IoleRae wanting a conversation about someone being pitiful/pathetic and potentially mentally disabled to end is not the same as dismissing someone’s complaint about sexual harassment. @Wizz provided a link to the complaint (which, thank you, because I can’t search MSB) and if the conversation wants to focus there then that is fine.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                                        • T
                                          Testament
                                          last edited by

                                          Can we just go back to talking about the ‘Do Not Arx’ image?

                                          That was a bit more fun less uncomfortable.

                                          I don't know what I'm doing. Poke at Seven Nations sevennations.aresmush.com port 2021

                                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                          • WizzW
                                            Wizz
                                            last edited by

                                            I wasn’t aware before this thread that he was cognitively impaired. That explains quite a lot about his other behaviors, and in that light my laughing at them was in pretty poor taste, and I’m sorry. @bear_necessities and @Bessarion were right to come to his defense and point that out. I said what I felt like I needed to say about where his inappropriate behavior crosses a line and @mietze explained how that isn’t excused by disability and that you shouldn’t hesitate to maintain boundaries just because someone is disabled, and that’s probably just a good place to leave it imo.

                                            bear_necessitiesB J W 3 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 5
                                            • First post
                                              Last post