Bannings
-
@Aria Thank you for sharing! I think a lot of us are more than willing to try
-
-
Even if I want to yell at someone about how theyâre being a total shitty asshole, I want to yell at them with the right pronouns.
-
-
Even if I want to yell at someone about how theyâre being a total shitty asshole, I want to yell at them with the right pronouns.
I laughed way harder at this than I should have.
See, everyone? @Roz has it.
âTheyâre being a totally shitty asshole.â
âI want to yell at them.â
âUgh, Aria. Theyâre the fucking wooooorst.â -
There isnât some sort of nodebb plugin thatâd let people add pronouns somewhere handy, is there? Maybe to the little hover tooltip over avatars, or at least an entry in the profile form? Could be nice.
-
There isnât some sort of nodebb plugin thatâd let people add pronouns somewhere handy, is there? Maybe to the little hover tooltip over avatars, or at least an entry in the profile form? Could be nice.
You can put it in your signature. (Because no, there isnât any that I can find. There were a few, and they havenât been updated in eons.)
-
@Pavel Gotta add to mine, and everyone should also maybe link to the top of their âwhere to find me/join in my crimes against MUSHdomâ thread, if they have one.
Or donât Iâm not your mom. At least, not yet.
-
-
-
-
@GF Yes. Thatâs pretty much it. Though being plus-sized, which also comes with BREASTS*, Iâm also keenly aware that I will never quite be able to figure out if Iâm not entirely comfortable identifying as female because Iâm not female or because Iâm just bad at performing it âproperlyâ.
Regardless of the changes I make to my appearance, people will continue to perceive me as distinctly female, just either with the additional labels of âbutchâ, âdykeâ, âunprofessionalâ, âlazyâ, or âphysically ill todayâ, all of which Iâve received at varying times when having short hair, wearing menâs clothes, or not wearing makeup.
I donât know the answer to my own question, and wonât ever be able to find out, because Iâm also not the right size or shape to do âambiguously queerâ properly, either.
*Watch the video. Itâs hilarious.
-
-
@Pavel Itâs an SNL sketch called âLingerie Storeâ and is a wildly accurate and wildly entertaining portrayal of what trying to buy a bra is like when you practically need industrial equipment to carry 'em around.
-
-
As the old âThose who are not welcome were those engaging in personal attacksâ line has been trotted out again, letâs actually look at what happened.
So. The bannings started after Ganyâs post of 7:31pm on the 5th of May.
The first people to post was Karmabum stating they were not breaking any rules, and Gany should go back to pretending this isnât happening. Result? Ban
Second is Snackness saying Karmabum was accurate and that she isnât sorry for posting, as she isnât in secondary school. Result? Ban
Tsar says it is obvious Gany doesnât want convo, so why not lock the thread rather than ban people, critiqued Ganyâs tone and suggested she step. away. Result? Ban
Arkandel posts mild criticism of Derpâs ability to admit he is wrong, and asked for clarification on points. Result? Not banned.
Meg posts that people didnât deserve this, and begs Gany to unban and lock thread. Result? Ban. Later reversed.
Third-Eyed Crow suggests Anglo Saxon fornication to Gany. Result? Banned (Note: The first real âpersonal attackâ)
Narson, the evil dipshit, states they are confused on why Arkandel isnât banned for the fourth post after no talking. Result? Banned.
Sahin asks âWhy?â and posts a cat GIF. Result? Warning to âDonât. Just Donâtâ.
Arkandel posts asking what did he do in response to Narson. Result? Gany offers to PM with him.
Gany posts to Sahin and Arkandel.
Ifrit posts critiques Ganyâs âEmotionless Cat Lawyer Boyâ persona, and suggests she has destroyed 10 years of community by not just stepping back, he then says goodbye. Result? Banned
Bear_Necessities repeats Third-Eyed Crowâs offer. Result? Nothing at this point (Note: Arguably the second real âPersonal attackâ)
Flyrannosaurus posts a gif of an M60 firing out of a helicopter. Resault? Nothing
Bear states they werenât silenced and for Gany to stop and reverse bans. Result? Banned
Sahin says they wonât stop and asks for ban. Result? Banned.
DeletedUser posts gif of mass slapping. Result? Nothing
Herja points out the hypocrisy in this action compared to Derp situation, and states Gany looks like a clown. Result? Ban
Prism states that theyâd rather be banned than hang around with who is left. Result? Banned
Scar states Gany is unhinged. Result? Banned but then reversed.
Coin states âmessage receivedâ. Result? Banned but reversed without comment and removed from even original banned list.
Groth asks if this is how it ends. Result? Nothing
Hellfrog posts a GIF asking what in tarnation. Result? Nothing
Selira says Gany has killed the board. Result? Nothing
Ghost posts a question mark, then says the baord is getting better from bannings in a second post. After a while he posts two more times, after another Gany ask to stop posting. Result? Finally banned. Then reversed.
3543thrh67 posts that Gany is surprised. Result? Nothing
Cobalt posts asking Gany to take a cool off. Result? Gany states she wonât ban Cobalt for it.
ILuvGrumpyCat posts pointing out Ghostâs problematic history, and also addresses their disappointment in Ganyâs choices. States she can go ahead and ban them. Result? Banned
OldFrightful says just lock the thread. Result? Nothing
Roz posts that Gany has degraded her authority, and cross links to the Macha/Farfalla logs. Result? Banned
Now. When it comes to personal attacks, the more clear are Scar, Third-Eyed and Bear-Necessities. Of those, Scarâs ban is reversed and Bear has to post a second time in order to get banned. The challenge to authority, the questioning of it, rather than the personal attack is what gets the ban. And Iâd argue that is the more obvious common denominator there. And in terms of whether bans got reversed, several of those who were banned (Like Coin), Gany stated her own feelings that these were the hard ones. So friendship matters more in not being excluded (kindaâŚwellâŚwhatâs the term? Clique behaviour?).
So no, those that are unwelcome on MSB arenât those who engaged in personal attacks. It is those that asked questions of an admin who admits their behaviour could be reasonably described as unhinged (hence the reversal of Scarâs ban for the unhinged personal attack). Several of those who did engage in personal attacks or expressed glee at the bannings etc didnât even get a warning. Again, suggesting that standards were relaxed for those supporting the admin position even if their behaviour mirrored or was worse than those being banned.
-
How I, a man famous for being willing to throwdown with anyone regardless of how much evidence my opinion has behind it, managed to not post in that shitstorm at all is beyond me.
-
I do not believe that those left involved at MSB are capable of running a successful online forum about text based role playing games. Whether you think that bar is high or hilariously low, they donât cross it.
-
@Apos As with MUs, success is dependent on those judging. Even if nobody posts ever again, they will claim it is successful.
-
@Pavel yeah but theyâll know better themselves, they just wonât admit it out loud