Brand MU Day
    • Categories
    • Recent
    • Tags
    • Popular
    • Users
    • Groups
    • Register
    • Login

    The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck)

    Scheduled Pinned Locked Moved Rough and Rowdy
    96 Posts 26 Posters 115 Views 1 Watching
    Loading More Posts
    • Oldest to Newest
    • Newest to Oldest
    • Most Votes
    Reply
    • Reply as topic
    Log in to reply
    This topic was forked from The SA In Games Thread (Good Luck) Tez
    This topic has been deleted. Only users with topic management privileges can see it.
    • ShygamingS Online
      Shygaming
      last edited by

      This is probably where I’m going to bow out because, yeah, you’re right about the fundamental disagreement.

      What I’m going for isn’t really collaborative storytelling in the sense you’re describing. I don’t want every major outcome negotiated between the players involved. I want a game where the world, the mechanics and other characters can impose outcomes on you that you didn’t choose.

      That is not going to be for everyone. I completely accept that.

      I think collaborative RP where everyone is making sure everyone else gets the kind of story they want can be lovely. It just isn’t the experience I’m trying to build.

      H N 2 Replies Last reply Reply Quote 2
      • H Offline
        howyadoin @Shygaming
        last edited by

        @Shygaming said:

        I want a game where the world, the mechanics and other characters can impose outcomes on you that you didn’t choose.

        Okay but you are avoiding the question of how you as a game runner think you are going to actualize this ideal on your game?

        Given that any RP at all can only be accomplished by the OOC consent of the players involved (the act of RPing alone indicates the fact of consent): how would you police the inevitable scenario of someone who didn’t want SA as part of their character’s history simply choosing the FTB option and thereafter just refusing to acknowledge that anything happened - effectively retconning it for themselves and others?

        PavelP 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
        • PavelP Offline
          Pavel @howyadoin
          last edited by

          @howyadoin said:

          the act of RPing alone indicates the fact of consent

          I’d only majorly quibble on this statement. I don’t have anecdotes to share, but I can absolutely see a situation in which one feels compelled to ‘follow through’ on RP they don’t want to do in order to satisfy another person. Much the same as in any “was it really SA…?” situation.

          He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.

          @Faraday said:

          Pavel is probably right

          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
          • JumpscareJ Offline
            Jumpscare @Shygaming
            last edited by

            @Shygaming said:

            The same is true more broadly. A kidnapping story where the hostage wants to be kidnapped is not really a kidnapping story. A horror story where the victim wants to be hunted is something else entirely. A dystopia where everyone genuinely enjoys being oppressed has lost the thing that made it dystopian.

            I feel disgusted for even having to ask this, but let’s follow this to the conclusion you seem to be hinting at: Do you want players of your game to feel like they’re being r*ped?

            If not, please describe the what you’re hoping players experience when someone r*pes their character.

            Game-runner of Silent Heaven, a small-town horror MU.
            https://silentheaven.org

            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 3
            • N Online
              NotSanni @Shygaming
              last edited by

              @Shygaming said:

              This is probably where I’m going to bow out because, yeah, you’re right about the fundamental disagreement.

              What I’m going for isn’t really collaborative storytelling in the sense you’re describing. I don’t want every major outcome negotiated between the players involved. I want a game where the world, the mechanics and other characters can impose outcomes on you that you didn’t choose.

              That is not going to be for everyone. I completely accept that.

              I think collaborative RP where everyone is making sure everyone else gets the kind of story they want can be lovely. It just isn’t the experience I’m trying to build.

              What you want is PvP. You can just say that.

              1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
              • TezT Online
                Tez Administrators
                last edited by

                I don’t expect shy to come back and engage with the thread. I feel like they’ve stated their position and dipped.

                But what I’m not clear on is if people will actually know what they are potentially signing up for when they join the game.

                Not knowing is wild to me. I don’t think you can responsibly engage with SA, *isms, etc. as content in RP without people fully knowing what they are signing up for and consenting to engage in it. That is so foundational to how I engage with games. Even in PVP games. Even in Limited Consent games. Even in Non Consent games. You know what you are signing up for.

                I don’t think you can responsibly RP about these things without that.

                she/they

                N 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                • N Online
                  NotSanni @Tez
                  last edited by

                  @Tez said:

                  I don’t expect shy to come back and engage with the thread. I feel like they’ve stated their position and dipped.

                  But what I’m not clear on is if people will actually know what they are potentially signing up for when they join the game.

                  Not knowing is wild to me. I don’t think you can responsibly engage with SA, *isms, etc. as content in RP without people fully knowing what they are signing up for and consenting to engage in it. That is so foundational to how I engage with games. Even in PVP games. Even in Limited Consent games. Even in Non Consent games. You know what you are signing up for.

                  I don’t think you can responsibly RP about these things without that.

                  I’m pretty sure you get some kind of warning about how bad things might happen to your character when you create a character, but I don’t recall how explicitly it’s stated.

                  My gut instinct (mostly because Shy posted this to an Armageddon forum, and just refused to answer the question someone posed about if there’s S.A. in the game) is that it’s probably not explicitly written out that your PC might get assaulted like that, and that you have to make the connection based on a general “this is a non-consent game” policy and the coded capability to do the thing.

                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                  • KestrelK Online
                    Kestrel
                    last edited by Kestrel

                    Calling it wish fulfilment is wild. I had my character attacked at sea, drowned, swallowed by a whale, and kept trapped in an underwater dimension for a week at one point, none of which I wish to experience IRL, nor did I require control over the story, or need to know what was going to happen in order to enjoy it.

                    But I went along with it because a friend of mine was running the story, I happen to trust them, and was feeling fatigued enough with the main grid at the time to say “hey fyi if you wanna see this through don’t feel bad about keeping me off-grid for a bit, I could use a break anyway”.

                    On a separate occasion, a friend of mine actually killed my character. It turned out neither of us actually intended the outcome, because they’d emoted attacking, I’d mistakenly interpreted their intention as killing the character (which would’ve been a rational consequence for the action I’d taken), so I emoted dying, they OOCly went “wtf I didn’t mean it like that”, I responded “lol oops”, they said, “hang on I can contrive a way to resurrect you” and I said “nah dw I’m good, this is a good ending for the character”.

                    The wish being fulfilled here is for a good story that everyone involved enjoys. Everyone should wish for that, it’s the point of storytelling! It’s actually super not necessary, even in a story where the outcome isn’t predetermined, and conflict between characters is permitted without prior consent, to have any party involved be OOCly miserable.

                    RozR 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                    • RozR Offline
                      Roz @Shygaming
                      last edited by

                      @Shygaming said:
                      Can you imagine how compelling The Handmaid’s Tale would have been if all the women were actually secretly into what was happening to them? If everyone in Gilead had enthusiastically consented then you have not made the story safer. You have removed the entire point of the story.

                      The same is true more broadly. A kidnapping story where the hostage wants to be kidnapped is not really a kidnapping story. A horror story where the victim wants to be hunted is something else entirely. A dystopia where everyone genuinely enjoys being oppressed has lost the thing that made it dystopian.

                      buddy i don’t know how to tell you that the CHARACTERS are not the same thing as the PLAYERS. the CHARACTERS are not secretly into it. the CHARACTERS are experiencing a horrific nonconsensual trauma.

                      if you think that a player cannot happily RP a thing that their character is horrified or traumatized by — sorry, but that’s a skill issue.

                      and, again, you are still going to be attracting players who are into the CNC aspect! you have built tools for it. they will still have their kinky fun. CNC refers to the PLAYERS engaging consensually with the topic, not the characters. it’s non-diegetic kink.

                      it’s just that this overall perspective actually prioritizes players who are into inflicting stuff specifically on those who don’t want it. they want the other PLAYER to feel violated, not the characters.

                      so it’s just like — you are disdaining the players who might enjoy this together but in a way i guess you find icky?? But you are enabling the players whose goal is actually OOC harm.

                      you should much prefer having the CNC kink players to the latter.

                      she/her | playlist

                      1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 10
                      • AposA Offline
                        Apos
                        last edited by

                        the myth of consensual SA rp. isn’t there someone we forgot to ask

                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                        • TezT Online
                          Tez Administrators
                          last edited by Tez

                          I did some thread surgery to remove Jumpscare as looking like the originator of this thread. Apologies to anyone who was disrupted by that.

                          ETA: Previous thread here: https://brandmu.day/topic/690/paroxysm-split-off

                          she/they

                          1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                          • RozR Offline
                            Roz @Kestrel
                            last edited by

                            @Kestrel said:

                            Calling it wish fulfilment is wild. I had my character attacked at sea, drowned, swallowed by a whale, and kept trapped in an underwater dimension for a week at one point, none of which I wish to experience IRL, nor did I require control over the story, or need to know what was going to happen in order to enjoy it.

                            to be fair, it can be wish fulfillment in the sense that people are into the topics in a fictional setting that they don’t want to happen IRL; that would just mean the wish being fulfilled is doing RP/story around the concepts. you can find folks happily kinking on any of those scenarios. these can just be masochism, breathplay, vore, and confinement 😂

                            which is, again, why i think it’s silly for a line to get drawn around the idea of not wanting CNC kinky players to enjoy the noncon RP in a kinky way. like, buddy, people kink on all types of horror a whole lot

                            she/her | playlist

                            1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                            • PavelP Offline
                              Pavel
                              last edited by

                              Finally, someone who uses PvP semantically correctly but incorrectly in every other way.

                              He/Him. Opinions and views are solely my own unless specifically stated otherwise.

                              @Faraday said:

                              Pavel is probably right

                              KestrelK 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 4
                              • KestrelK Online
                                Kestrel @Pavel
                                last edited by

                                CvC apology form

                                MisterBoringM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 7
                                • MisterBoringM Offline
                                  MisterBoring @Kestrel
                                  last edited by

                                  @Kestrel It’s gonna be okay.

                                  Proud Member of the Pro-Mummy Alliance

                                  1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                  • MegM Online
                                    Meg
                                    last edited by

                                    Quick someone tell me what CVC is and why I should care about this new term. I am not making any apology for any of this.

                                    My preferred term is playfighty.

                                    TezT 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1
                                    • TezT Online
                                      Tez Administrators @Meg
                                      last edited by

                                      @Meg Character vs Character as opposed to Player vs Player.

                                      she/they

                                      MegM 1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 0
                                      • MegM Online
                                        Meg @Tez
                                        last edited by

                                        @Tez I figured that out right after I posted, but now I think it’s funnier never to know.

                                        Sorry, I don’t understand and I can’t read.

                                        1 Reply Last reply Reply Quote 1

                                        Hello! It looks like you're interested in this conversation, but you don't have an account yet.

                                        Getting fed up of having to scroll through the same posts each visit? When you register for an account, you'll always come back to exactly where you were before, and choose to be notified of new replies (either via email, or push notification). You'll also be able to save bookmarks and upvote posts to show your appreciation to other community members.

                                        With your input, this post could be even better 💗

                                        Register Login
                                        • First post
                                          Last post