Don’t forget we moved!
https://brandmu.day/
Concordia Thread
-
@Third-Eye Not to disagree with you, but in the year 2023, I think you can assume that for any text put out in public, there’s a decent chance AI assistance was used.
-
@Third-Eye It’s already happening from what I’ve seen. People been using AI to create DnD one-shots or campaigns. I remember reading a reddit thread about some of the better ones and some of the terrible ones it spat out.
I could see that eventually making it’s way to mushes for inspiration in creating plotlines.
-
@Tez said in Concordia Thread:
@helvetica Especially with the volume of rosters that were created, it neither particularly surprised me NOR, if I’m honest, am I SUPER BOTHERED by the use of it to generate one-paragraph backgrounds or placeholder text on 100 princes and princesses.
(Rinel is gonna come for me.)
Yeah to be honest I’m not actually all that bothered by tiny TEMPORARY backgrounds that can be expanded by actual people into real backgrounds, if noted, so I’ll concede to @sao’s claim of violence.
That said, if they’re AI generated, I’m not really sure how much they can actually tie into a metaplot, so I’m not hugely sure why the ban on OCs.
This is, of course, still entirely speculative!!
bird's still the word
-
@Polk OK but this is a writing-based hobby wherein we do writing together on an improvisational basis and in that context there needs to be a label if I’m not interacting and engaging with other humans doing the same thing
Edit: like I am not saying not to use AI ever especially when processing large amounts of information or asking for details or while brainstorming, but if the RP or the GMing or the descs or the rosters are being plonked into the server for players to interact without human creativity applied it is majorly different for me.
-
That’s implying that any of you here aren’t actually AI.
-
@Rinel The hiatus on OC creation allows them to control the flow of players into the game.
-
@Testament ohhhhh I didn’t know the “you feel” stuff for descs when you use it!! I had wondered why I’d seen metapose descs like that done on a few different places. It was super weird because it’s so not done in the rp communities I’ve been in (where “You see a handsome man who makes your knees weak if you’re a chick” descs are rightfully mocked). I had never seen that in room descs before until fairly recently but that makes sense if people are using those tools.
But I hate You feel x descs. It really breaks my immersion and enjoyment for whatever reason. Maybe because unlike when a player metaposes at you in an invasive way you can respond but you can’t really fight a room desc!
-
@mietze I’ll fight a room desc WITH MY FISTS
let it be a challenge to you
-
@sao And you’ll feel triumphant.
-
@Rinel said in Concordia Thread:
I’m not really sure how much they can actually tie into a metaplot
If the vast majority of the game was plugged into the AI generator and the correct prompts were used? They can tie in integrally.
-
@mietze This is just my experience, but when I’m using an AI program to help create a desc, be a room or person, or item, the result always tends to have this impression that it’s describing something and telling the reader how they feel about it. Or should feel.
Sometimes you get weird stuff. And you’re given a flood of verbs on how you, as a reader, interpret something.
-
An inescapable comparison to this game is Arx, where GMs have been run ragged trying to keep up with our need to be catered to. I can’t begrudge these people for experimenting with a strategy that might be more sustainable for them.
-
This is very interesting to me.
When I see stuff like that I tend to assume that the person is just perhaps abusing their thesaurus a bit.
I do tend to write a lot of detailed and descriptive scene sets, flavor poses, and descs so now I’m wondering if people think I’m lifting them off AI! Or maybe they don’t think that because I don’t metapose in a directive way in them.
-
@mietze I checked your description before I ran into my daily limit. You are PROBABLY a HUMAN.
MAYBE.
-
-
@helvetica I hope the roster has a good balance of older PCs then. What ultimately did me in on Arx post-Ari was that the roster skewed young.
-
@hellfrog said in Concordia Thread:
I think using ‘AI’ is going to be pretty obvious but also not really - a problem?
This should probably be (yet another) thread split off of this one. Without going too far off on a tangent, I would argue that the “problem” is in normalizing use of these tools, which objectively harm creatives.
-
@Faraday There’s always room for more AI discussions in life, lord knows, but MOST of the posts are particularly about the use of AI on this game. I’m not sure why you would suggest splitting it – and I’m pretty split-happy as a person.
-
@Tez I feel like I have an idea where @Faraday is coming from. (Faraday, apologies if I’m putting words into your mouth. Not intending to do so here.) I had a post in mind to reply to this thread, but my points related just to Concordia were super brief, and I realized what I had to say quickly began going diverging into general discussion about the uses of AI.
(Isn’t there already a thread about uses of AI on this forum? I’m a little zzz so I’m too lazy to look right now.)
With respect to Concordia specifically, I’m not really against the use of AI to “automate” creation of content such as roster characters’ quirks and descriptions in particular, but I would draw the line at using it to generate the content for explaining the game’s theme and its underlying details. (Unless the game literally was made to showcase the content being written by a generative AI, anyway.)
I do concur with Faraday about the impact on creatives, but that’s a subject for discussion in a general topic on generative AI, so I will stop there.
-
@dvoraen There are a couple threads:
https://brandmuday.mythicus.net/topic/316/would-you-roleplay-with-ai
https://brandmuday.mythicus.net/topic/355/ai-megathread/
I’m p interested to hear what people think about AI-generated text in games, so I totally hope folks take the more general discussion over to one.
