Another factor to consider that I just remembered is that if a player is applying for a role that is of considerable IC power or will have a significant immediate impact on the current plots in the game, a lot of staff (rightly) require a more detailed and lengthy application (and sometimes an interview) to approve the character.

@Pavel said in Long or Short? Application Process!:

Which isn’t something I deal with at work RL at all.

If I had a dollar for every required piece of documentation that didn’t actually help me at my job, I’d have retired to a nice estate a decade ago.

@Pavel said in Long or Short? Application Process!:

Such games should, then, have those requirements explicitly detailed somewhere. What mechanics need explanation, what needs to be explained, and why, etc.

Agreed.

I’m weird. I’m for however long it takes a person to write an application that shows they have a functional understanding of both the mechanics and lore. Additionally, a player should have notes for any mechanics that need explanation. If your character has a Mild Phobia on their sheet, you need to explain that in your stuff. For some people that can take 30 minutes. For some people it can take days.

I’m more worried about how the coded systems of a given MU interferes in a persons ability to both build their sheet and write out all their background details and any notation they may need for specific stats on their sheet.

@Gashlycrumb said in Numetal/Retromux:

That’s where you get the people who stop logging in before they even know they got approved.

Slightly tangential, but a long long time ago, I was part of the staff for a whitelisted Minecraft server. For various reasons we had two tiers of whitelisting, one to give people basic access and the ability to claim a chunk and build for themselves, and the second to give people access to several mods we were using that could be dangerous in the hands of trolls. To get to the second tier of access, you simply had to be active for 60 days without being a troll or jerk or whatever. We had this clearly lined out in our server rules. I shit you not, one in four people would apply to be whitelisted, and then vanish, only to get the whitelisting while they were gone and return 60 days later to find out their whitelisting was removed for inactivity.

@Testament said in General Video Game Thread:

I now understand the jokes about how this game is single handedly holding up SquareEnix financially.

Yep. FFXIV is really keeping them in business. Prior to that it was the Dragon Quest series.

@Kestrel said in Numetal/Retromux:

I’ve played on games with lengthy chargen processes, and games with quick/painless chargen process.

The games that really bother me is the ones that have lengthy chargen processes because their coded chargen forces it to be that lengthy because of bugs and various archaic command processes.

@Gashlycrumb said in Numetal/Retromux:

There’s nothing about being a MU staffer that makes a person more honest. I don’t know if I’ve dealt with @Wikibara before. I have been told that one of the Retro staffers is a person I have dealt with whom I find untrustworthy.

From your history of posting here, I have assumed you find 100% of staff on 100% of games untrustworthy, so that doesn’t surprise me.

@bear_necessities said in Numetal/Retromux:

I don’t disagree but also it is very very very clear from the wording of that post that there’s an expectation that an inappropriate amount of time is spent on applications.

I believe that inappropriate amount of time is subjective. What one person sees as inappropriate is appropriate to another. So in this case, the amount of time was inappropriate to you and @Wikibara, and probably at least some other non-zero number of people out there.

So if we’re normalizing that, whose subjective opinion are we using to set the baseline?

@bear_necessities said in Numetal/Retromux:

But also if 1-2 hours spent on an application is considered minimal effort and not good enough for a game then woof, probably better to move on. We all have lives, right? RIGHT?!

That really depends on what the 1-2 hours produced. I’ve ran into players who take 2 hours to write two unintelligible sentences in a pose, so it’s feasible that what was written, even though it took 2 hours, was awful.

Amount of Time != Quality

@BurnNotice said in Numetal/Retromux:

I got no dog in this fight, I’m mostly around here for entertainment value these days when some idiot like a Wikibara pops up and almost nothing ever gets me to post but holy shit, reading that ban announcement for some reason made me so thankful that I don’t mess around with these long-winded, Biblical Length Style application process WoD games anymore.

From what it sounds like, RetroMUX wasn’t looking for a biblical length application, just an application that reflected a basic understanding of written English alongside a working knowledge of the WoD universe.

@Gashlycrumb said in Numetal/Retromux:

@MisterBoring Yeah, or they could have been, as they said, asking for clarification on incomprehensible feedback, or pointing out catch-22 feedback, or pointing out that they corrected as the feedback requested but the staffer is still giving the same complaint. (Indeed, I’ve been made familiar with the experience of changing what’s asked and having staffer continue to complain about the thing that isn’t there now, and of having staffer complain bitterly that I don’t just say “okay,” and do things that aren’t really possible.)

Well, based on the post before yours that you I guess didn’t read, it looks like the reasons for the ban were, and I’m sort of summarizing here:

• Overly defensive when responding to staff feedback
• Writing of such low quality that the AI question came up
• Causing staff an imbalance in their workloads due to all of their OOC activities interacting with other players.
• Begging players to help with the application, being told by the players to go ask the staffer in question, and then going deer in the headlights.
• Showing signs that they weren’t actually familiar enough with WoD to write a cohesive background.

So yeah, maybe you’re right.

@Gashlycrumb said in Numetal/Retromux:

Sounds to me like they’re trying to “avoid headaches” by having unclear requirements for apps and going by the vibe, and then fucking with an actual person by pretending that it’s a problem with the app instead of admitting that they just don’t like @Wikibara’s eyeliner or something.

Or it could be that staff continued to provide feedback to them which they then ignored, on repeat, until staff could not deal with it anymore and handed down a ban. It could also be that they themselves said something untoward to a staff member and got banned. It could be that they plagiarized giant portions of a known work of fiction for their backstory.

Until someone from staff or close to staff deigns to post some sort of ban message or otherwise, we won’t know the whole story.

@Wikibara You could easily just share the Discord name of the offender and if they happen to be here, they can defend themselves. People who are associated with RetroMUX would invariably be able to confirm whether that person plays on RetroMUX.

And you can avoid sharing racist screed while still identifying broken stairs in the community.

@Wikibara Let’s return to the issue then. It sounds like you weren’t writing in a way that jives with the Staff there in the way that they’d prefer, so they showed you the door. I’m sorry it didn’t work out for you, but at the same time, if they had approved you, it sounds like they’re just trying to avoid headaches all around and you’re slightly upset by it.

ALSO, please for the love of god turn on your PM privacy on Discord, you’re just asking to get hacked or have more random racist nonsense sent to you.

@Wikibara said in Numetal/Retromux:

Clearly, I’ve found the apologists - perhaps it’s required that I share the specific message that I received, because there’s otherwise no cause for any person to receive antisemetic messages, ever.

Edit: Clearly you could not possibly have done anything to cause them to give you a cold shoulder, and since we don’t have those PMs / the logs from the game, we have to just trust that you were 100% in the right in this situation.

That seems like broken logic to me.

1. ) Player A gets banned from Game Z.
2. ) Random Discord User #1 sends Player A a racist message.
3. ) Random Discord User #1 must therefore be sent by Game Z or somehow related to Game Z.

This is similar in logical function to:

1. ) Bob is dishonest about his job application at Company A and fails to get the job.
2. ) Random Jerk on the Street #1 tells Bob to get a life in front of McDonalds.
3. ) Random Jerk on the Street #1 must therefore be sent by Company A or somehow related to Company A.

ALSO: Who in 2026 lets randos send them PMs on Discord?

@Wikibara said in Numetal/Retromux:

I can see the error in how I parsed that sentence. No, I did not receive an antisemetic message from the admin in question; that message was separate and arrived about eleven minutes later. As to how connected that they are, I am not spending any time contemplating. The two events took place so close, one merged with the other, although not likely by the same hand.

You’re still making it sound very much like they are connected. What person potentially related to RetroMUX sent you racist screed?

@DapperPenguin said in Numetal/Retromux:

You are telling the truth and treating it like another nit to pick.

Yeah, it does sound like it’s just another nit to pick, when it should really be a full call out of a game’s staff for being racist.

@Wikibara said in Numetal/Retromux:

some routine antisemitic stuff, nothing that unusual.

Did you get this from their staff?

Ted Turner, founder of CNN, TBS, and TNT.