Bannings
-
-
@Wizz OHAI. WHERE HAVE YOU BEEN?
I step away for
like several months lolJUST A LITTLE BIT and LOOK WHAT HAPPENSeta: jk, jk. there’s not a non-boring answer to that question, I just needed a break! But I am super happy to see everyone picking right back up and moving on after everything!
-
-
@Kestrel All the receipts! Or at least a bunch of them.
-
it’s so frustratingly disingenuous to pretend like being the current caretaker of a community forum, that you’ve been the caretaker for for less than 20% of its total run time, is somehow the same as building and running your own game.
those two things are very different things. we all can see that.
-
@Meg you don’t feel “safe” calling this out on Derp’s echo chamber?
You know, where they’ve installed such rigid guardrails as “it didn’t happen on THIS site so it pretty much didn’t happen?” Or my new favorite “it is happening RIGHT HERE IN REAL-TIME AS GHOST IS ATTACKING PEOPLE ON THE FORUM but we’re just pretending those receipts are for a different store?”
-
I for one can recall the MSB thread about DownWithOPP being on Arx wherein a bunch of different players he creeped out were able to compare notes and realize it wasn’t just a once-off thing and was actually a recurring pattern, and thus felt confident in putting in complaints on the game. Because a lot of them were in a place of “he was kind of weird but maybe it was just accidental” place of not being sure they should report.
There was also an instance someone else has remembered where someone was hopping around a lot of Ares games and being creepy on rosters and the word going around on MSB helped at least one game quickly identify him and toss him out before he’d done too much damage.
But right, of course, MSB never helped to identify bad actors.
-
Spider was always really really hot and heavy on “pics or it didn’t happen”, too. I wonder why.
(I don’t actually wonder. They waged long-term campaigns against their targets, pretty much never anything you could point to individually as a specific ‘this was the problem’ incident. Say, changing the subject every single time their target spoke up on a channel about something. It’s not even REPORTABLE, but after 20 times of being silenced like this, it’s obviously a pattern.)
eta: It’s like nobody over there remembers that logs can be faked, or that several of the genuinely bad actors routinely do so. One of them likes to preemptively go to staff with the “hysterical crazy girlfriend” bit to poison the well preemptively about her victims.
the entity previously known as Sunny
-
I for one can recall the MSB thread about DownWithOPP being on Arx wherein a bunch of different players he creeped out were able to compare notes and realize it wasn’t just a once-off thing and was actually a recurring pattern, and thus felt confident in putting in complaints on the game.
Or when a post I believe was literally called “vague post” helped stop Ruiz from serially predating people on GH - where she (female-player in case that helps Derp distance himself from the accuser this time) was conscientiously doing things in such a way that avoided receipts.
But clearly we were all just being hysterical women.
-
@Jennkryst said in Bannings:
@Kestrel All the receipts! Or at least a bunch of them.
omigod are you still talking about that jeez its like youre obsessed with me just let it go and move onnnnnnnnnn
-
Rant about the topic, rather than ranting at anyone in this thread:
I loathe the notion that receipts are necessary for any complaint to be taken seriously. Like, especially if they’re of an embarrassing or sexual nature, like… no.
In my case, I divulged those receipts with someone I trusted, they made the call along with a literal avalanche of evidence to ban someone creepy, and no one is fucking entitled to it.
Just fuck everything about that mindset. I know the natural retort is that it’s a slippery slope which can quickly devolve into witch-huntery, but consider also that it’s a slippery slope to making victimized and abused people put their darkest moments on display just to satisfy the internet’s fucking Id.
Fuck off.
-
@Solstice Sometimes, I think that those who push for ‘receipts’ the hardest aren’t really looking for ‘evidence’. They are looking for a reason to delegitimize the reporter because they aren’t the ‘right’ kind of victim.
-
@Jennkryst said in Bannings:
@Kestrel All the receipts! Or at least a bunch of them.
omigod are you still talking about that jeez its like youre obsessed with me just let it go and move onnnnnnnnnn
I was applauding @Kestrel for doing the thing, but I will also applaud others, whee!
-
@Jennkryst Just in case the sarcasm wasn’t clear, I wasn’t looking for kudos. I was making fun of Ghost for talking all that good shit daring people to bring receipts, and then acting like receipts don’t matter when they’re brought against him.
-
@GF Too bad, I am also obsessed with you, Regina George style, because we are all hawt mean girls.
Mummy Pun? MUMMY PUN!
She/her -
@Solstice I feel the same way about demanding “evidence.” Eyewitness testimony is literally evidence, they just don’t like that evidence.
-
I loathe the notion that receipts are necessary for any complaint to be taken seriously.
There’s a difference, in my mind, between ‘not taking seriously’ and ‘not acting on’. A single complaint without anything to support the assertion? Taken seriously, not necessarily acted on beyond instructions to avoid each other.
More than one complaint, less-to-no evidence required. At least in my opinion.
-
I feel like any credibility really tanked when they referenced dealing with the complaints of the banned as “negotiating with terrorists”.
-
@Dreampipe said in Bannings:
I feel like any credibility really tanked when they referenced dealing with the complaints of the banned as “negotiating with terrorists”.
For the sake of clarity, this was only said (that I know of) by Ganymede not any of the remaining/newly acquired leadership.
-
@Solstice I totally understand that reaction, and applaud it for the sake of your mental health and safety.
I know you’re not addressing anyone in this thread, and I’m not aiming to be defensive, because I know this wasn’t aimed at me or anyone in this thread. When I’m looking for “receipts” as a staffer (I don’t think I have or ever would use that term), I don’t need gory details. But I do want to get a few broad strokes and perhaps some generalized examples. I want to know how someone was creepy, so that I can compare it to what I’ve seen of them and what others may have reported to me. Particularly the latter – if I’m getting multiple people from different playgroups telling me that a particular player is OOCly talking about their RL kinks without prompting, that’s something I can act on directly.
As a staffer, I neither need nor want “receipts” to be public or detailed. I don’t want to open someone up to reliving trauma in that way. I do, however, want a few broad strokes so that I know the type of creep I’m dealing with and can compare it to any other complaints.
