Why is Pack closing?
-
Alright folks, official modvoice time: If you tell someone to stop talking, and they say they’re going to stop talking, don’t just immediately tag them in the conversation again. It’s no bueno.
-
For what it’s worth, at no point did I demand silence from anyone nor do I have the authority to make such demands. I merely asked for the targeting of a single person in this thread over semantics to stop because it was getting nonsensical.
But please, carry on.
-
@Roadspike Your response is very nice and did not harm me in any way, but back there at the end of the argument I noticed myself having a little panic attack because the responses I’ve mostly received have stirred up some shit that I don’t want to talk about. I’m still kind of dealing with that right now, so–and again, nothing you said contributed to this; I’m only writing this as a response to you in this because, ironically, you having done me no harm gives me faith that you will be good enough to honor this request–I’d appreciate not being tagged in this thread for a little while.
I hate to ask you to do that at all instead of taking responsibility and blocking this thread in a way that prevents notifications, but I haven’t yet figured out a way to do that, if there is one. Please forgive me the presumably unnecessary drama.
-
Set it to ‘Ignoring’.
-
@Pavel I mean, could you have done that without tagging.
-
I also don’t know that ignoring a thread will keep you from getting notifications of specifically being tagged in it.
she/her | playlist
-
@Roz It doesn’t. But it’s a decent enough step.
-
@Pavel It does seem to work, actually! Just made Roz be a test monkey.
she/they
-
You can also just set individual people to ignore as well. Sometimes, that’s probably more useful than just setting a whole thread to ignore.
-
@Tez said in Why is Pack closing?:
@Pavel It does seem to work, actually! Just made Roz be a test monkey.
Huh, neat. I don’t think it used to.
-
I never played on the game but when I was looking at it I thought the policies and theme were very clear FWIW!
I do think there’s a chunk of people who just ignore and do what they want and then claim But I Didn’t Know.
Like in a certain game that makes it very clear there’s no prostitutes there would still be people putting that in their backgrounds talking about it like at least a couple of years later.
Games that say full gender equity still will have people flouting that constantly.
And a lot of the time the people doing that are the problem people go figure!
So I wouldn’t at all chalk this up to policies not being clear necessarily. I’ve just known far too many people that are purposefully ignorant, flout very clear policies, ect.
I do think sometimes folks are too nice about letting “nice, non problematic” people slip a bit (though most of the time those folks are problematic too just not to the same degree) but I also think that being overly draconian also seems to not solve them problem either.
Well, fuck. I don’t know.
-
@mietze said in Why is Pack closing?:
Games that say full gender equity still will have people flouting that constantly.
The amount of theme-correction I felt like I had to do when staffing on Battlestar Galactica games about this, to people who claimed to be fans of the show…idk. I do not know. I def agree people will just play the thing they want to play and ignore what the game actually is often enough, and they aren’t worth worrying about until they bring other players along for the ride (which is an aggravating amount of the time).
I want something else to get me through this
Semi-charmed kinda life, baby, baby
I want something else, I'm not listening when you say good-byeShe/Her or They/Them
-
@Third-Eye said in Why is Pack closing?:
@mietze said in Why is Pack closing?:
full gender equity
theme-correction
-
@Third-Eye said in Why is Pack closing?:
@mietze said in Why is Pack closing?:
Games that say full gender equity still will have people flouting that constantly.
The amount of theme-correction I felt like I had to do when staffing on Battlestar Galactica games about this, to people who claimed to be fans of the show…idk. I do not know. I def agree people will just play the thing they want to play and ignore what the game actually is often enough, and they aren’t worth worrying about until they bring other players along for the ride (which is an aggravating amount of the time).
Just blow them up in the fucking tubes
The other lesson here:
“Don’t just let players write theme wiki.”
I woke up feeling so good, I think I’d better call in sick/ I need a personal trainer to help me hold my drink
I plan to be spontaneous next time we meet/I’m putting off procrastinating until next week
I’ll get onto it when I give a shit -
@Pyrephox said in Why is Pack closing?:
fluffy consent games about My Little Ponies.
.
I feel called out, somehow. XD -
@Cobalt Fuck that person! You did the right thing!
-
I’ve been told, this person is encouraging other people to get an expunged version of the database for them.
The audacity.
Cobalt@Under the Stars
cob.alt@Discord
Cobalt#[email protected] -
@Cobalt I’m sorry, but what the actual fuck?
-
@Cobalt wtffffffffffffff
I’d say name and shame her over where she haunts, but I wouldn’t actually wish that experience upon you.
-
@Cobalt said in Why is Pack closing?:
I’ve been told, this person is encouraging other people to get an expunged version of the database for them.
The audacity.
Excuse me?
This definitely reads like theft. Literally stealing someone else’s database and theme even if it’s making a copy without permission or consent from the creator.
Now that’s a new low.
