Bannings

[KarmaBum]

At least still being banned prevents me from going back there for the sole purpose of pointing out that Ganymede is a coward who lacks the courage to stand by her own convictions.

Also that Derp is a misogynist prick who lacks the self-awareness to realize he’s the problem, not all of us.

(hi derp & gany & whoever else is lurking. when you get bored of echo-chambering with the four people that agree with you, you know where to find us.)

[helvetica]

@sao said in Bannings:

It’s completely arbitrary.

To quote a scholar: Unhinged.

[Narson]

The haphazard and bizzare approach kind of confirms everything I’ve been thinking about Gany and Derp. I look forward to them repeating their new official truths and whatever nonsense they claim is ethics into their echo chamber. And well, echoes always work better in empty spaces I guess.

[Snackness]

@BloodAngel I want to post the RIGHT TO JAIL gif but I also don’t want to take the enjoyment of doing that away from @tsar .

[sao]

But, well, I told them I would wait for them to finish reviewing before I made any decisions, since that was their request. What they’ve demonstrated is that their review was conducted according to some bizarre internal metrics that banned @Narson for saying basically the same thing as @Meg who they rescinded the ban on, while simultaneously deciding that Ghost is a part of the community they want to keep but not @Roz or @tsar –

In short, a part of the community I will be putting behind me and not returning to.

But the attorney in me is super annoyed about the total absence of transparency and failure of standards or logic.

I am glad that the original wildly unjust ban was reversed, though.

[Third Eye]

@helvetica said in Bannings:

I have no intention of retracing my steps.

Don’t worry, we’ll always know the truth and have your sig to remind us.

[helvetica]

@Third-Eye said in Bannings:

@helvetica said in Bannings:

I have no intention of retracing my steps.

Don’t worry, we’ll always know the truth and have your sig to remind us.

Oh, that’s not fucking going away any time soon, lol.

[Herja]

[IoleRae]

I had higher hopes.

Bleh.

eta: this hurts my heart guys. Bleh bleh bleh. I really will miss what used to be there. Another something I love is no more, and that sucks. A lot.

[Pavel]

Don’t mind me, just compiling a list for @Tez when we feel the need to fly off the handle and conduct a bizarre purge.

[bear_necessities]

@sao said in Bannings:

deciding that Ghost is a part of the community they want to keep

This about sums up that place in a nutshell, now.

I hope they enjoy the community they’ve created.

[Narson]

@sao said in Bannings:

bizarre internal metrics that banned @Narson for saying basically the same thing as @Meg who they rescinded the ban on, while simultaneously deciding that Ghost is a part of the community they want to keep but not @Roz or @tsar

The cynic in me suggests it is all a shitty attempt at Crisis Management PR. Unban Meg because she set up the discord where people discussed. Look how kind and magnanimous they are. Ghost because, look, they even forgave one of M**ing’s most persistent haemorrhoids.

Meg and Farfalla shouldn’t have been banned in the first place, I’m not even sure Ghost should have been - it all stems from those initial bad decisions. But I’m fairly sure I was less of a dick than Ghost. I just asked why Arkandel wasn’t in trouble for posting after the ‘Don’t post’ second warning when others were. I’d guess they still don’t have an answer beyond ‘We are inconsistent and unethical, and were embarrassed at how inconsistent and unethical we were being’. Oh well, nothing of value was lost. I wasn’t a huge contributor to MSB. And we have a place where admins haven’t had to warn other admins not to blame the victims of sexual assault. Which is nice.

[Snackness]

@sao All I did was talk after Gany said not to talk, and disagree with her shitty ban on Farfalla.

And not kiss her ass.

(eta I also agreed with @KarmaBum so it really was probably their fault anyway)

[sao]

@Snackness Yeah, you absolutely did nothing banworthy either and you aren’t alone. Sorry I didn’t include you in my examples of wtaf. Clearly I think you and @tsar come as a set.

[Snackness]

@sao Fair!

eta: also I didn’t mean to come off as ‘BUT WHAT ABOUT MEEEEE’ though I see how I did and maybe I did mean to a little because I’m still wtf-ing.

[Testament]

There are those that were banned that I do not often agree with. Others I’m unsure if I actually like, but I by no means wish their voices silenced for nothing more than dissent. For having an opinion.

It’s morally wrong.

[Snackness]

Should we take bets on how long it takes for that thread to get locked?

[Third Eye]

I’ll admit the arbitrary nature of the whole thing (both the initial wave and the latest de-bans) bugs me on some level, even if I’m still fine with and more ‘lol that was wild’ than anything else about my ban. End of the day I still mostly just want to move on.

[Snackness]

@Third-Eye Yeah, same. But my innate sense of justice is still smarting. It will pass.

And as @bear_necessities just told me, “much like sound, there is no justice on the internet”

[Jennkryst]

Mine is likely never going to get lifted, because it was after they stopped banning people at the drop of a hat when I called Gamy a coward and told her she should ban me, too. So I technically requested it.

But whatevs.

They have repeatedly shown that they want ORDER IN THE COURT so until Gany and Derp step down and they find someone else who can act ethically to step up, I will keep my toys in the sandbox where I am at least tolerated, and nobody is vocally looking for an excuse to kick me out.