pvp vs pvp
-
I think there are actually 3 groups of players. PVE people, IC-PVP people, and OOC-PVP people.
PVE people don’t like PVP, or accept that it happens but do everything they can to avoid it.
IC-PVP people are going into a game playing a character they know will get into IC conflicts with other characters and want that conflict to provide story to the other players on the game.
OOC-PVP people are going into a game looking to generate a body count, with no regard for the story, and they don’t honestly care what happens story-wise (but are sticklers for the mechanics of the system) in the long run, as they’ll just create a new character and start over when they die.
I’ve seen all three groups, and I probably am in the IC-PVP group. If my character gets into a conflict that, because of storyline reasons, involves another PC, so be it, I just hope the staff on the game adjudicates it fairly.
The OOC-PVP people need to just leave and go play a MUD rather than trying to generate massive body counts where others are trying to create story.
-
@MisterBoring There is also a fourth kind of person; the PVE players who are incredibly toxic, but use the protections of PVE-oriented game policies to get away with bad behavior. Without PVP acting as a failsafe, these players often cause games to fail because no one can stand not being able to meaningfully stand up to the bully.
If left unchecked, they cause WAY more problems for staff and the playerbase than they’re worth.
I think the OOC-PVP people are the minority, and easily caught/dealt with. No one is advocating for them on games, least of all me. Toxic PVE players are really just as bad though, if not worse because they often fly under the radar, and often are left alone by staff due to the whirlwind of shit they cause with brigading and such.
Outside of these outliers, most people realize that competition is fun, and so is losing sometimes. There should be a place for mature players to throw dice at each other and still be friends afterwards.
-
@Cygnus said in The 3-Month Players:
Without PVP acting as a failsafe, these players often cause games to fail because no one can stand not being able to meaningfully stand up to the bully.
The failsafe against toxic players should be staff action. Going PVP just because a player is toxic seems toxic in it’s own right.
Proud Member of the Pro-Mummy Alliance
-
I mean, if you could show me a pvp game that DIDN’T devolve into players being shitty OOC I would probably be fine with it. It’s just that every time I have been on a game with PVP elements, players were shitty OOC and tried to game systems to “get” other people’s characters regardless of story, whether it was trying to exploit times that people were offline in order to fuck with their stuff, using staff access to cheat their way to better stats / gear, etc., or just… being incapable of their character losing ground on anything without turning into a toddler throwing a tantrum.
If a player is toxic, PVPing them is a terrible idea anyway, btw. If someone is awful, I don’t want to play with them regardless of whose character is going to “win” the interaction.
-
@Cygnus said in The 3-Month Players:
There should be a place for mature players to throw dice at each other and still be friends afterwards.
One of the most fun TTRPG campaigns I was in involved a bunch of backstabbing (figurative and literal) amongst PCs. My reporter PC stuck her nose in where it didn’t belong, and ended up getting killed by my BFF’s PC. Good times!
The difference between that and MUSHing is that we were all friends.
You say there “should” be a place for mature players to throw dice and still be friends, but that presumes:
- You’ll be able to create a game with only mature players.
- They were even friendly in the first place.
Ample experience with MUSHes over several decades shows that getting either of these things (let alone both) on an open game is nigh-impossible. PVP games have all the same inter-personal drama as PVE games plus the drama inherent in players working against each other. That’s just objectively more drama, and I don’t blame anyone who doesn’t want to deal with it.
The good news is, that with the cheapening of cloud computing and the advent of newer platforms like Evennia and Ares, it’s easier than ever to spin up your own game where you can PVP to your heart’s content.
-
@MisterBoring We’re both talking about IC toxicity right? Because that’s what I’m talking about.
If someone does something toxic to me ICly, they should fully expect to get capped ICly.
OOC toxicity should be handled by staff, but let’s be real. That toxicity doesn’t usually happen in the open in ways that staff can easily handle. That’s assuming that the staff who made a game which caters to this type of thing isn’t in on it. Sadly that is often the case, see RetroMUX, Haunted Memories, Fallcoast, or the Reach for examples.
Anyway, the laws of FAFO are a great equalizer. If everyone has a gun, everyone is a lot more polite.
-
@Faraday I don’t know much about Evennia, but Ares sadly does not offer the OOC masquerade that is necessary in PVP-type games. Ares caters to a sort of PVE experience that is going in the wrong direction for me personally, more for low-conflict games IMO. I’m sure it’s great for those that like it, but it’s not for me. And that’s ok! There’s no problem with people that prefer PVE oriented games.
RhostMUSH is a great codebase that easily allows for OOC masquerade. And for the very reasons you mentioned, it’s really important to protect people’s personal information in a PVP style game because there are people who take it too far.
Regardless, I often see people who like PVP-oriented games getting invalidated in the MU* community, which is what my and Rocket’s post is about. This forum is a small fraction of an already small community, yet those coming into this space would think that there isn’t a desire or need for a PVP-type game and that’s just not the case. There’s so many benefits to PVP in a game that have been outlined which are generally ignored by game-runners based on personal preference – the reason they’re the only people making text-based MU*s is because the PVPers have been driven away from the hobby due to a rather vocal minority and lack of gameplay which they find engaging.
EDIT: I do find it’s easier to deal with conflict at a small scale in tabletop. Even then it needs to be approached carefully, but it can be very fulfilling. At the same time, I think it’s even harder to do it right in tabletop: generally you have 4-6 players who trust each other with a Storyteller who is attempting to get them all on the same page for something, whereas on a MUSH you can actually have different factions/groups duking it out without as much overhead on a singular ST to make them all get along once a week for four hours. I personally think MU* is a great medium for PVP games. Not everyone has to be best buds in order to have memorable RP with each other, they just need to be civil.
-
@Cygnus said in The 3-Month Players:
but Ares sadly does not offer the OOC masquerade that is necessary in PVP-type games
I disagree with your assertion that OOC masq is necessary for PVP games. (The TTRPG PVP games I’ve been in certainly did not require any such thing, and if we imagine the hypothetical mature playerbase you described, they wouldn’t need it either). Nevertheless, you are correct that Ares has OOC transparency baked in and it would take a lot of custom code to undo that. Rhost and Evennia would probably be a better bet.
-
@Cygnus said in The 3-Month Players:
Anyway, the laws of FAFO are a great equalizer. If everyone has a gun, everyone is a lot more polite.
What about my character that doesn’t have a gun getting ganked just for funsies?
-
@Faraday it’s a damn shame it doesn’t because there’s so many features I like and which make things easy, and I wouldn’t have to relearn semaphores after years of trying to forget.
In terms of why I think it’s necessary, we all know that MU* players can be immature sadly. Certainly not all of them, but if I can remove the ability for people to see each others alts or staffers to not see jobs that don’t pertain to them, I’m going to do it rather than wonder about whether it happened when it comes up. That kind of granular control is important for me, for many different things. Ideally for me, players wouldn’t be able to communicate anywhere but ICly, not even in pages or @mail or OOC Bboards/channels. There would need to be other ways to facilitate RP that didn’t involve OOC communication, but that’s doable – +events for instance is fairly benign, or ‘Looking for RP’ tags.
Players would just log in to roleplay, and log out when they’re done. I’d make it against the rules to share any information, including alts, discord usernames, sheet information, or basically anything at all even about yourself to another player. Because in a PVP game, you don’t want people knowing that stuff. How much of that is accomplishable in Ares, I don’t know.
This is one of the things that Liberation did right by not having a Discord for their game. It breeds that kind of mean-girl stuff which is anathema to a game’s lifespan IMO.
-
@catzilla You get a gun for free by signing up to play on a PVP-oriented game. It’s up to you whether to load it, but if you don’t, you shouldn’t be surprised when it doesn’t protect you. Your ‘gun’ could be socially influencing muscle-heads to protect you, getting actual retainers on your sheet, a fortified Haven/place of business, etc, rather than an actual gun. But just like I wouldn’t randomly walk down an alley alone at night in real life, I wouldn’t do so on a PVP game.
The fear of potentially getting ganked is part of what makes this exciting for some players. It’s not for everyone, and that’s ok. You don’t have to app in!
-
@Cygnus said in The 3-Month Players:
There’s so many benefits to PVP in a game that have been outlined which are generally ignored by game-runners based on personal preference – the reason they’re the only people making text-based MU*s is because the PVPers have been driven away from the hobby due to a rather vocal minority and lack of gameplay which they find engaging.
You talk about game-runners making games based on their personal preferences like it’s a bad thing. But people have always run games that they’re going to enjoy playing on.
I remember a time in MUSHing where there were a lot more PVP games. There became fewer and fewer not because of some arbitrary exodus, but because the people willing to run games became less willing to play on PVP games.
Why is that? You blame a vocal minority, I blame the extra toxicity and headaches involved in running a PVP game amongst internet strangers.
How much of that is accomplishable in Ares, I don’t know.
I mean, anything’s possible. But Evennia gives you a pile of LEGO bricks and says “build what you want and have fun”. Ares gives you a LEGO castle and says “here’s a castle already built for you, have fun.” If you want a spaceship, it’s far more sensible IMHO to take Evennia and build a spaceship than it is to try to turn Ares’ castle into a spaceship.
-
I remember when I joined a oWoD game for the first time as a mortal and was told “hey, try not to go out alone because there are a lot of assholes on the game who will just kill you”. As a result, the little RP I did get was inside a private room and ended up leaving the game pretty quickly.
Maybe that’s fun for some people, but it’s definitely not fun for me.
I’ve yet to see a situation in a game where PVP was solely an IC thing and there was 0 OOC influence involved in it. The problem with PVP games will always be players, and while there are bad players on PVE games too, at least they can’t just kill you for being in the same room with them.
-
I sure wish there was an active PVP MUSH so people could just go there lol
Also maybe this is ignorance talking because it’s not my thing but aren’t RPIs generally pretty PVP-forward?
-
@Faraday The exodus wasn’t arbitrary, it didn’t happen in a vacuum. PVP players went on to play PVP video games mostly because video games became a thing in the first place. It didn’t have anything to do with people being unwilling to run games, it’s that those early devs switched their medium and made extremely popular video games. Now many PVPers play Rivals, League of Legends, COD, etc, and for those who didn’t make the switch to video, they went to MUDs which have always been more popular than MUSHes.
What you’re describing is selection bias which has been building on itself for many years via the types of people who didn’t move on to begin with. But the PVP players have not disappeared, they still exist and many would be interested in a WoD game that had PVP especially with the recent resurgence in tabletop games. That’s really all I’m trying to get across with this post, that this playstyle is valid, liked, and is something players are looking for. Look no further than the millions of people across the world playing PVP games for an example. MU* could learn something from those genres rather than dealing with compounding blandification.
-
T Tez referenced this topic
-
@Cygnus said in pvp vs pvp:
Look no further than the millions of people across the world playing PVP games for an example.
Oh yes please I want my MUSHes filled with dozens of teenagers calling me every slur in the book because I didn’t play right, please please please make my MUSHes more like these video games that are held in such high regard.
-
@bear_necessities MU’s are already like this, just replace teenager with elderly romance novelists
-
This is on Game Gab. We’re here to, in theory, be constructive. If you want people to have a reasonable conversation about PvP, maybe don’t call all PvE games bland games filled with elderly romance novelists. Like?? It’s not a PvP conversation. It’s a conversation about PvP.
-
@bear_necessities said in pvp vs pvp:
Oh yes please I want my MUSHes filled with dozens of teenagers calling me every slur in the book because I didn’t play right, please please please make my MUSHes more like these video games that are held in such high regard.
So deliberately misrepresenting PVP games is ok? I was just throwing the ball back in their court and meeting their energy.
PVP games are not filled with teenagers throwing slurs. That’s nonsense. There’s huge communities of PVP gamers that aren’t like this.
-
High-stakes competitive PvP isn’t really my thing, but I can see how it could be appealing if it were done in a way that made it easy to jump in, easy to come back after a character gets killed, easy to resolve conflicts between characters without needing staff intervention, and that had pretty even game balance so that the PvP fights were actually challenging rather than just one-sided gankfests, and so that no single character or group of characters remained “safe” for very long.
And WoD just seems like a really counterintuitive choice for something like that.
- It has complex and convoluted rules that often differ significantly between spheres and that are a frequent source of arguments among players.
- Character generation is complex and time-consuming.
- WoD game balance is legendarily poor, both between splats and even between individual characters in the same splat.
- WoD puts a heavy focus on personal storytelling, so players tend to get more invested in their individual characters, and losing them feels like more of a hit.
Some of these things could be fixed! You could trim down the number of available options into a much smaller set that were reasonably balanced against one another and that reduced the time needed for character creation and the need for significant staff oversight. You could excise or rewrite some of things that make combat time-consuming and complex. You could throw out the idea of personal storytelling entirely and approve or deny characters strictly on the basis of whether their math adds up. You could, in short, make the process of getting into the game, participating into the game, and getting back into the game a lot more like popular PvP video games.
I have never played Fortnite, but I really doubt that it (or any other popular PvP game) makes you sit out for several hours working on a new character when you get killed. When death is a frequent occurrence, then the amount of investment that death costs a player needs to be smaller. The more common it is, the easier it has to be to get back into things. WoD is the opposite of that.
