Web-based CharGen or in-game CharGen
-
@Yam I like anything that doesn’t make me do too much math
-
@Yam
I prefer web-based by a mile. It is much easier (for most users) to navigate theme files and fill out a form on a web page than running individual commands which all continually push data further up the buffer. -
The third thing: vibes-based chargen, in which stats are inferred and implied, and dice challenges resolved through the pageantry of dance.
Okay, really, I’d just go with well-documented and either web-based with a registered login provided upon request, or well-documented and handled on-site, with approval mostly rubber-stamping after the sniff-test is done.
-
I prefer web-based, but echo what people have said about anything being fine so long as it’s clear and well-documented.
-
web based is so nice. telnet travels on the devil’s whispers
-
I want the machine to do the mathening. I do the storying, the machine does the mathening. That’s why we have the machine.
-
As someone who prefers in-game chargen, web-based is by far better.
-
Years ago, I used to be all about using MUSH Client and doing stuff in game. But after playing on a few Ares games, I was fully converted over to web based. A lot more flexibility with web based and the visual presentation was a lot easier to work with.
-
web based. I never want to use a client again.
-
Even as somebody who still plays on-client a fair amount, I wouldn’t want to do CG in a pure text interface again. It’s just so much easier on web to save things/proof things/edit things.
Also staff-side it’s way easier to make small changes if I need to, give notes to players, or see where somebody’s getting an error (either through user error or something screwy with the game).
