MU Peeves Thread
-
@spiriferida For L&L, really play up the politics, intrigue, animosity between rival families, and management aspects to the level that no one has time to knock boots on screen.
Ceterum censeo Carthaginem esse delendam
-
@howyadoin said in MU Peeves Thread:
Yeah - I didn’t want to go on the “good vs. bad policy” side quest,
stop a debate about a game policy?
here?
-
@Ominous said in MU Peeves Thread:
@spiriferida For L&L, really play up the politics, intrigue, animosity between rival families, and management aspects to the level that no one has time to knock boots on screen.
Demand characters have so many administrative skills, they become virtually unfuckable.
-
@helvetica said in MU Peeves Thread:
@Ominous said in MU Peeves Thread:
@spiriferida For L&L, really play up the politics, intrigue, animosity between rival families, and management aspects to the level that no one has time to knock boots on screen.
Demand characters have so many administrative skills, they become virtually unfuckable.
Joke’s on you, I’m into that shit
-
@Tez The Administrator’s Thinly Veiled Fetish! That means every time you interact here…🫣
Got what you wanted, lost what you had.
-
My question is, if a game is going to have a policy that forbids getting into a relationship with another character that hasn’t been around for more than two weeks yet (and they can have whatever policy they want), surely there would be a way for the other player to check the actual sheet date of that character’s creation… right? SURELY?
I’m not entirely sure what I’d do if someone spanked me for flirting stupidly at my friend’s character on day 13, admittedly.
And yeah, note that this is unrelated to people lying, that sucks.
-
@Muscle-Car Why do you think I’m always so eager to fork threads?
-
@howyadoin this person seems like a creep & liar who needs a solid dose of the banhammer but I never think OOC lying is okay with or without hardons
-
@Pavel said in MU Peeves Thread:
@Third-Eye said in MU Peeves Thread:
Gdoc porn with a friend
The last thing I want is Google giving me an AI summary of my TS.
Could be worse. Could give it to Gemini Notebook and have it generate a podcast with two fake people talking about your TS.
-
@Tez said in MU Peeves Thread:
@helvetica said in MU Peeves Thread:
Demand characters have so many administrative skills, they become virtually unfuckable.
Joke’s on you, I’m into that shit
TIL that shibari with Red Tape is a thing.
-
@Third-Eye said in MU Peeves Thread:
I’m somewhat baffled they don’t just go to sex games or Gdoc porn with a friend but…idk I am not an expert in these things.
The ethics of lying to get into someone’s virtual pants aside (always wrong, always creepy)…
If someone is desperate enough to be a fucking weirdo about it, even the sex MUs and Gdoc porn aren’t necessary. Every time I see the bizarre lengths that people go to get TS, I’m like, “…Y’all know AO3 is free, right? Like, you can read a nearly infinite number of horny words with basically zero effort. Same with Imaglr. Or with PornHub. You can go have a wank without bothering anyone, if you go do it over there.”
But I dunno. I just think it’s funny that there’s some part of my brain pointing out that not only is their behavior morally wrong, it’s also inefficient.
-
@Aria said in MU Peeves Thread:
a fucking weirdo about it
As a(n honest) fucking weirdo about it, I am randomly reminded of that one NYC CoD game (not the Ares one, but I forget what the name was) where someone got extremely heavy-handed about my WerewolfLawyer chargen build, then heavy handed leading the first scene to the smut, then (allegedly) got extremely ick’d out by me trying to recruit other people to make a pack where they insist I telegraphed the implication that smut happened on channel.
Zany shenanigans were afoot, I just bounced entirely.
Now only the coolest of kids get my smut, after taking an intensive multi-choice questionnaire. Good Luck!
-
@Aria said in MU Peeves Thread:
Like, you can read a nearly infinite number of horny words with basically zero effort. Same with Imaglr. Or with PornHub. You can go have a wank without bothering anyone, if you go do it over there.”
isn’t the, uh…point of TS that it’s still collaborative writing, tho?
not that I would know, Innocent and Pure Lamb of Jesus’ Pasture that I am.
-
@Wizz said in MU Peeves Thread:
isn’t the, uh…point of TS that it’s still collaborative writing, tho?
I think in cases where you’re going to be such a nutter about it (like above) it’s likely less about the collaboration and more about the power trip. But still that would require another person, yes.
-
@Wizz said in MU Peeves Thread:
isn’t the, uh…point of TS that it’s still collaborative writing, tho?
I mean, ideally yes? But I also just kind of assumed that if someone has such rampant disregard for the other person that they’re lying to get TS, the whole “other person” part really isn’t factoring into the decision-making anymore, anyway. Like if your goal is to get off without really caring what you have to do to manage it, there’s faster and easier ways to go about it that don’t involve being awful to other people. They can be more ethical and more efficient with their smut!
-
@Aria said in MU Peeves Thread:
Like if your goal is to get off without really caring what you have to do to manage it, there’s faster and easier ways to go about it that don’t involve being awful to other people. They can be more ethical and more efficient with their smut!
But the goal likely isn’t to get off without really caring what they have to do to manage it. It’s to get off with another person without really caring what they have to do to manage it. And just any person may not do. Cost, looks (in this medium, writing style), personality, etc. are potential qualifications for the other person. Rape would be much less of a thing if all rapists wanted was just an orgasm.
