Web-based CharGen or in-game CharGen
-
I prefer web-based, but echo what people have said about anything being fine so long as it’s clear and well-documented.
-
web based is so nice. telnet travels on the devil’s whispers
-
I want the machine to do the mathening. I do the storying, the machine does the mathening. That’s why we have the machine.
-
As someone who prefers in-game chargen, web-based is by far better.
-
Years ago, I used to be all about using MUSH Client and doing stuff in game. But after playing on a few Ares games, I was fully converted over to web based. A lot more flexibility with web based and the visual presentation was a lot easier to work with.
-
web based. I never want to use a client again.
-
Even as somebody who still plays on-client a fair amount, I wouldn’t want to do CG in a pure text interface again. It’s just so much easier on web to save things/proof things/edit things.
Also staff-side it’s way easier to make small changes if I need to, give notes to players, or see where somebody’s getting an error (either through user error or something screwy with the game).
-
@Yam Well, there you have it, folks; this website’s least controversial post!
-
@Muscle-Car
So, what you’re saying is, we should set fire to the trees?
/s -
@Third-Eye I dunno about chargen, but on the fly pose editing in the webportal is amazing!
